My Gleanings

Sunday, March 29, 2009

1955 Best Films and Reviews Cahiers du Cinema

In 1955, Cahiers du Cinema printed 54 film reviews covering 51 films. Two of the films reviewed -- Rebecca and Hallelujah -- were vintage Hollywood productions. All but one of these reviews were published in the Les Films section. Federico Fellini's La Strada was considered of such an importance that its review appeared in the front Le Sommaire section of the March 1954 issue. The "notes on other films" section was discontinued temporarily. On 17 occasions, the reviewer of the film cited the film on his 10 Best Films list, while on 29 occasions, the film was not recognized in the reviewer's list. Eight reviews were filed by reviewers who did not contribute a list. Twenty-eight of the films made at least one list.
Once again Cahiers published 17 Best-Films lists.
The three older generation Cahiers regulars -- André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Pierre Kast
Seven younger generation Cahiers regulars -- Charles Bitsch, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut and Eric Rohmer (By the end of 1955, Maurice Scherer had pretty much abandoned signature in his Christian name in favor of the nom de plume "Eric Rohmer".)
The other six posting lists were: critic/teacher Henri Agel, film director and theorist Alexander Astruc, novelist/playwright Jacques Audiberti, producer Pierre Braunberger, critic and later director Ado Kyrou, critic Claude Mauriac, and director Alain Resnais. Once again, Jacques Audiberti was the only participant born in the 19th Century, but this year Pierre Braunberger joined in the the 50-something category. Claude Mauriac and Henri Agel were the only 40-somethings.
The convention here will be for the film title to be in green, the reviewer to be in red, whether or not he listed the film to be in white, followed by an enumeration in magenta of those who had listed the film.


Jan 1955
Les Diaboliques André Bazin NO Jacques Audiberti, Claude Mauraic
Romeo and Juliet Jacques Siclier No List (1954 list) André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauriac, François Truffaut
Le Dernier Pont Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Jacques Audiberti, Pierre Braunberger
The Desert Rats Philippe Demonsablon NO (1954 list) Claude Chabrol
Okasan Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO (1954 list) Henri Agel, Jacques Audiberti, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Kast, Alain Resnais

February 1955
Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves François Truffaut NO
On the Waterfront Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Dial M for Murder Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Charles Bitsch, Jean-José Richer
Le Pain vivant Claude Chabrol NO

March 1955
Le Sommaire
La Strada André Martin No List Henri Agel, Alexander Astruc, Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauraic, Alain Resnais, Jean-José Richer, Eric Rohmer
Les Films
Sabrina Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Apache/Push Over Claude Chabrol NO/NO François Truffaut (Apache), Jacques Rivette (Apache), Jacques Audiberti (Apache), Alexander Astruc (Apache)
Rebecca Claude Chabrol NO

April 1955
Johnny Guitar Robert Lachenay (François Truffaut) YES Charles Bitsch, Philippe Demonsablon, Alain Resnais, Jacques Rivette
Rear Window Claude Chabrol YES Alexander Astruc, Pierre Braunberger, Charles Bitsch, Philippe Demonsablon, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Alain Resnais, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, François Truffaut
Rififi Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou, Jean-José Richer
Destination Gobi Philippe Demonsablon NO

May 1955
French Cancan André Bazin YES Alexander Astruc, Pierre Braunberger, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Eric Rohmer
Voyage in Italy Maurice Scherer (Eric Rohmer) YES Henri Agel , Alexander Astruc, André Bazin, Charles Bitsch, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut
Le Sel de la Terre Willy Acher No List Henri Agel, Ado Kyrou, Alain Resnais
La Tour de Nesle Robert Lachenay (François Truffaut) NO

June 1955
A Star is Born Charles Bitsch NO Eric Rohmer
Vera Cruz François Truffaut NO Ado Kyrou
This is Cinerama André Bazin NO
The Gold of Naples André Bazin YES Pierre Kast, Alain Resnais
A Far Country Philippe Demonsablon NO

July 1955
The Barefoot Contessa Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES
The Barefoot Contessa François Truffaut YES
The Barefoot Contessa Philippe Demonsablon YES
The Barefoot Contessa Claude Chabrol YES Henri Agel, Alexander Astruc, Charles Bitsch, Claude Mauraic, Eric Rohmer, Alain Resnais
Hill 24 Doesn't Answer Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Magnificent Obsession Philippe Demonsablon NO
The Romance of Liang Shanbo and Zhu Yingtai Willy Acher No List
Battle Cry Claude Chabrol NO

August-September 1955
Marty Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
08/15 André Martin No List
Human Desire Philippe Demonsablon YES Jacques Rivette
Them Fereydoun Hoveyda No List
World for Ransom Philippe Demonsablon NO

October 1955
Death of a Cyclist Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Jacques Audiberti, Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou
Kiss Me Deadly Charles Bitsch NO Alexander Astruc, Claude Chabrol, Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou, François Truffaut

November 1955
Les Mauvaises Rencontres Jacques Rivette YES Henri Agel, Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Charles Bitsch, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Alain Resnais, Jean-José Richer, François Truffaut
Run for Cover Philippe Demonsablon NO
Comicos Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES

December 1955
Les Grandes manoevres Jean-José Richer NO
Land of the Pharoahs (the direction) Jacques Rivette YES
Land of the Pharoahs (the screenplay) Claude Chabrol NO Charles Bitsch
Hallelujah Eric Rohmer NO
La Pointe courte Annette Raynaud No List
The White Sheik Pierre Kast YES Henri Agel, Pierre Braunberger, Alain Resnais
Lourdes and its Miracles Henri Agel YES Claude Mauriac
The Big Knife Jean-José Richer YES Alexander Astruc, Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Charles Bitsch, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Eric Rohmer, François Truffaut
Man without a Star Philippe Demonsablon NO
Der Letzte Akt - La Fin d'Hitler Jacques Siclier No List


Reviewed January 1956 and cited for 1955
Lola Montès François Truffaut YES
Lola Montès Philippe Demonsablon YES Henri Agel, Alexander Astruc, Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauraic, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer
Ordet Eric Rohmer YES Henri Agel, Alexander Astruc, André Bazin, Charles Bitsch, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette
To Catch a Thief Jean-Yves Goute (Claude Chabrol) YES Charles Bitsch, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer
The Blackboard Jungle Jean Domarchi No List
The Blackboard Jungle Philippe Demonsablon YES Claude Chabrol, Ado Kyrou
The Man from Laramie André Bazin YES
Raices Pierre Kast YES Ado Kyrou, Jean-José Richer

Reviewed February 1956
East of Eden François Truffaut YES Jacques Audiberti, Alain Resnais
The Barefoot Contessa/Lola Montès Jacques Siclier No List (see above)

Films not reviewed but cited
Continente perduto -- This Italian documentary which won a Jury Special Prize at Cannes and a Grand Silver Plaque at Berlin in 1955 was cited by Henri Agel.
Donne proibite -- cited by Jacques Audiberti
The Seven Samurai and The Creature from the Black Lagoon -- both cited by Ado Kyrou
Prehistoric Women -- cited by Alain Resnais


Labels: ,

Sunday, March 15, 2009

1954 Best Films and Reviews Cahiers du Cinema

Compiling the post on Joseph Mankiewicz and Cahiers du Cinema, I became intrigued that nearly every reviewer of a Mankiewicz film in the decade 1955-1965 went on to place the film on their 10 best film list for the year. Knowing the old dictum that at Cahiers, it was the person who liked the film the most who wrote the review, I have decided to examine the relationship between reviewer and 10 best lists as published by Cahiers. As chance would have it the first year for which Cahiers published lists was 1954 and that year, 1954, was the first year that Cahiers which had been founded in 1951 was the magazine which people usually intend when they refer to Cahiers du Cinema.
In 1954, films were reviewed in a section headed "Les Films". Most reviews were at least 2 pages in length. Occasionally, shorter reviews (about 1 column in length) were published in a subsection headed "Notes on other films".
This first set of "10 best films" of 16 lists was published in the January 1955 issue of Cahiers du Cinema.
Participating were:
Older generation of Cahiers regulars: André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast
Younger generation of Cahiers regulars: Claude Chabrol, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, Maurice Scherer (Eric Rohmer), François Truffaut
Others: critic Henri Agel, novelist/critic Jacques Audiberti, producer Pierre Braunberger, critic Ado Kyrou, critic Claude Mauriac, director Alain Resnais, screenwriter Annette Wademant. Truffaut's close friend, Robert Lachenay, whose name Truffaut was using as a pen-name, is also credited with a list. Since there is a 3 film intersect between the Truffaut list and the Lacheny list, my speculation is that the list is that of the real Robert Lachenay and not of the pseudo "Robert Lachenay". Of these, only Rivette and Kast would contribute lists every year (1954-1968) in the first cycle of Cahiers "10 best films lists".
Cahiers du Cinema published 45 full reviews of 46 films in the Les Films section; one film Gentlemen Prefer Blondes was reviewed by two critics and inone review, François Truffaut considered three films. On 12 occasions, the reviewer put that film on his ten best list, on 23 occasions the reviewer left the film off his list and no list was provided by the reviewer 12 times. All told 29 films of the films reviewed show up on at least one list. One must bear in mind that films reviewed in January and in February may have been considered as 1953 films.
As a side note, it is interesting to note the youthfulness of this group: Jacques Audiberti (55 years old) was the only individual who was beyond the age of 50. Pierre Braunberger (49 years old), Henri Agel (43 years old) and Claude Mauriac (40 years old) were the only others beyond 40. Almost half (7) were less than 30 years old.
The convention here will be for the film title to be in green, the reviewer to be in red, whether or not he listed the film to be in yellow, followed by an enumeration in magenta of those who had listed the film.
Reviews credited to Robert Lachenay were written by François Truffaut. I am unable to confirm the identity of the reviewer FL. There are a handful of articles published by Cahiers in the first 3 years credited to a Frédéric Laclos. I was unable to run down the identity of this "Frédéric Laclos" as a Google search for that term retrieves a few hits for a young baker with that name and few others for the articles published in that name in Cahiers. I suspect that it was a pen-name, but, that is only speculation.

January 1954
Les films
The Little Fugitive André Bazin NO
The Big Heat François Truffaut NO
Lili Philippe Demonsablon no list
Moulin Rouge Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Les Orgueilleux Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO

February 1954
Le Blé en herbe André Bazin NO Annette Wademant, Pierre Braunberger
Angel Face Jacques Rivette NO
La Red Robert Lachenay/ François Truffaut NO/NO
Julietta Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Notes on other films
The War of the Worlds Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
The Heart of the Matter FL No list
The Glass Managerie FL No list
Peter Pan Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Virgile FL No list
The Magic Box FL No list
Strange Desire of Mr. Bard Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Sadko Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Blackbeard the Pirate Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Ado Kyrou, Robert Lachenay
Sensualidad Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
La Rage au corps Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Girls in the Night Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Le Peintre reveron Lotte Eisner No list
Monsieur Robida Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Les Forceurs de Banquise Philippe Demonsablon No list

March 1954
Ruby Gentry Philippe Demonsablon No List Robert Lachenay, François Truffaut, Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer)
The Life of O'Haru Philippe Demonsablon No List Henri Agel, Jean-José Richer

April 1954
Touchez pas au grisbi François Truffaut YES André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauriac, Alain Resnais, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer), Annette Wademant
From Here to Eternity Jean-José Richer NO Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Mauriac
Roman Holiday Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES Pierre Braunberger, Annette Wademant
Children of Hiroshima Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES
Notes on other films
L'Ennemi public No. 1 FL No list
Le Defroque Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Si Versailles m'etait conté Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO Jacques Audiberti

May 1954
L'Amour d'une femme Jean-José Richer YES
I Vitelloni André Martin No list Henri Agel, Pierre Braunberger, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou, Alain Resnais, Jean-José Richer, Annette Wademant
It Should Happen to You Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut YES/YES Claude Chabrol, Alain Resnais, Jacques Rivette, Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer), Annette Wademant
Il Capotto Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Henri Agel, Jacques Audiberti, Claude Mauriac, Alain Resnais
Notes on other films
Beneath the 12 Mile Reef Jean-José Richer NO Jacques Rivette
How to Marry a Millionaire Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Annette Wademant, Pierre Braunberger
Thunder in the East Jean-José Richer NO
White Witch Doctor Jean-José Richer NO
A Personal Affair Claude Chabrol NO
Never Let Me Go Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Lure of the Wilderness Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Return to Paradise Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
La Guerra de Dios Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Mam'zelle Nitouche Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
La Revoltes de Lomanach Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Les Intragantes Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Le Guerisseur Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
La neige etait sale Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
The Masterson Affair Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Trouble in the Store Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO

June 1954
Monsieur Ripois Pierre Kast YES Henri Agel, Jacques Audiberti, André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Claude Mauriac, Alain Resnais, Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer)
Monika Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer)
The Wild One Pierre Kast YES Henri Agel, André Bazin, Pierre Braunberger, Ado Kyrou, Claude Mauriac, Alain Resnais
Destinees Jean Mitry No list
The Blue Gardenia Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer) YES Claude Chabrol, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut
Notes on other films
Flesh and the Woman Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Sang et lumière Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Traviata '53 Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut YES/NO
Pain, amour, et fantasie Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Jacques Audiberti, Pierre Braunberger, Annette Wademant
Secrets d'alcove Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Treasure of the Golden Condor Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Dangerous Crossing Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
The San Francisco Story Jean-José Richer NO
So Big Jean-José Richer YES François Truffaut
The Glass Web Jean-José Richer NO
Remains to Be Seen Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut YES/NO
Le Secret d'Helene Marimon FL No List
Act of Love Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Les femmes s'en balancent Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
The Stranger Left No Card Jean-José Richer NO
Quai des blondes Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO

July 1954
Gate of Hell Jean-José Richer NO Henri Agel, André Bazin, Ado Kyrou, Claude Mauriac, Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer)
La Provinciale Jean Domarchi No List Claude Mauriac
El Michel Dorsday No List Henri Agel, André Bazin, Claude Chabrol, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou, Jean-José Richer, Annette Wademant, Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut
L'Affaire Maurizius Jean-José Richer NO
La Lupa Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO Pierre Braunberger, Ado Kyrou
Notes on other films
Par ordre du tsar Jean-José Richer NO
Glinka Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Flight to Tangier Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO

August-September 1954
Gentlemen Prefer Blondes Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer) YES Claude Chabrol, Robert Lachenay, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut
Gentlemen Prefer Blondes Jean Domarchi No List (see above)
Robinson Crusoe Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES André Bazin, Claude Chabrol, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauriac, Jean-José Richer, Jacques Rivette
River of No Return/Prince Valiant/King of the Kyber Rifles François Truffaut YES/NO/NO Claude Chabrol(River of No Return), Robert Lachenay(River of No Return), Jacques Rivette(River of No Return), Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer) (River of No Return)
Boots Malone Philippe Demonsablon No List
Notes on other films
Orage Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
The Bandwagon Philippe Demonsablon No List Alain Resnais, Ado Kyrou
Les Infidèles Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
The Glass Wall Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Les Amants de la Villa Borghèse Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
The Secret Conclave Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO
Crime Wave Robert Lachenay/François Truffaut NO/NO

October 1954
No reviews

November 1954
L'Air de Paris Jean Desternes No List
The Caine Mutiny Jean-José Richer NO
Three Coins in the Fountain Jean-José Richer NO
Executive Suite Philippe Demonsablon No list Jean-José Richer

December 1954
Le Rouge et le noir André Bazin NO Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Ado Kyrou
Mogambo Etienne Loinod(Jacques Doniol-Valcroze) NO Maurice Scherer(Eric Rohmer)
Châteux en Espagne Jacques Doniol-Valcroze YES André Bazin, Claude Mauriac, Alain Resnais
Escalier du service Jacques Doniol-Valcroze NO
Les Lettres du mon Moulin André Bazin NO
Father Brown Etienne Loinod(Jacques Doniol-Valcroze) NO Henri Agel
The 5,000 Fingers of Dr T Remo Forlani No list Pierre Kast, Annette Wademant

Notes:
Some films cited in 1954 lists were not reviewed by Cahiers until 1955, they are:
Renato Castellani's Roméo et Juliette reviewed in January 1955 by Jacques Siclier who supplied no list for 1954. Cited by André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Pierre Kast, Claude Mauriac, and François Truffaut
Miko Naruse's Okasan reviewed in January 1955 by Jacques Doniol-Valcroze who did not list the film. Cited by Henri Agel, Jacques Audiberti, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Kast, and Alain Resnais.
Robert Wise's The Desert Rats reviewed in January 1955 by Philippe Demonsablon who did not contribute a list for 1954. Listed by Claude Chabrol.
Vsevolod Pudovkin's The Return of Vasili Bortnikov (French title La Moisson) was not reviewed, as such, in the pages of Cahiers du Cinema. Jacques Doniol-Valcroze had written about the film in a piece he contributed to the June 1953 issue describing a trip he had taken to the Soviet Union. He listed the film. Michel Mayoux wrote about the film in a mini-Pudovkin tribute in the August/September 1953 issue. He provided no list for 1954. Besides Doniol-Valcroze, Henri Agel listed the film.
Although John Huston's Beat the Devil was released in France in August 1954, it was not reviewed in Cahiers until February 1960 when Luc Moullet considered it a review with 4 other films. Cahiers co-editor Jacques Doniol-Valcroze posted the film to his 1954 lists as did Pierre Kast, Ado Kyrou and Alain Resnais.
The High and the Mighty was never reviewed in Cahiers; it appears on the 10 Best films (1954) lists of Claude Chabrol and Annette Wademant.
The Roberto Rossellini-Ingrid Bergman sketch from the film Siamo Donne was cited by both Jacques Rivette and François Truffaut.
The unreviewed MGM musical I Love Melvin was listed by Jacques Rivette.
Byron Haskin's The War of the Worlds was reviewed in February 1954 but was not selected on any list; his The Naked Jungle went unreviewed, however, it does appear on the lists of both Claude Chabrol and Robert Lachenay.
Robert Lachenay would cite three films that were neither reviewed by Cahiers nor listed by any other panelist: No niego mi pasado, Thunder Bay and Les Corsaires du Bois du Boulogne.
Ado Kyrou listed the unreviewed La Nave delle donne maledette.
Finally, the documentary Naufrage volontaire was not reviewed by Cahiers; a not surprising circumstance given that the film was apparently never finished. However, this did not prevent François Truffaut from listing the film 11th on his Ten Best list.

Labels: ,

Monday, March 09, 2009

From the review of Bob the Gambler published by Cahiers du Cinema in October 1956 and signed Jean-Yves Goute. (page 56, my translation)

"I never cease wondering why [Henri] Decaë is not formally recognized as one of the best directors of photography in France. The reasons given to me for this seem to me to be too petty and abject to be true. Yet it is that Decaë has a lot to do with the success of Bob the Gambler. The imagery is sharp without being lifeless, beautiful without being affected, and alluring without being mannered. Some little strokes are rather pleasing to the eye and to the senses like a beautiful phrase which does not trifle. Exactly suiting an intelligent, poetic and fascinating chronicle such as Bob the Gambler."

Jean-Yves Goute was a pseudonym which Claude Chabrol used on a few occasions. A little more than a year after this review appeared, Chabrol began filming his first feature Le Beau Serge with Decaë as director of photography. Decaë lit Chabrol's first four features, before Jean Rabier, an assistant of Decaë's, would become Chabrol's DP. Rabier would shoot virtually everything that Chabrol directed between Les Godelureaux in 1961 and Madame Bovary in 1991. Decaë would also work with François Truffaut on The Four Hundred Blows and film Godard's sketch for the film The Seven Deadly Sins in 1962, one of only two times in the early 60s when Rauol Coutard was not the DP for Godard. (The other time it was Jean Rabier who shot Godard's sketch for RoGoPaG.) Decaë also shot Louis Malle's first two features, Les Amants and Ascenseur pour l'échafaud and also 3 more films in the 1960s. And he continued to be Jean-Pierre Melville's cinematographer of choice.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Cahiers du Cinema and Joseph Mankiewicz 1953-1964

Jean-Luc Godard's film career was launch in June 1950 when he published his first review - a critique of Joseph L Mankiewicz's Dragonwyck - in the second issue of Eric Rohmer's Gazette du Cinema. So here is paragraph one of article one in the career of J-L G. (from Godard on Godard edited by Jean Narboni and Tom Milne (their translations, excerpts pages 13).
One day I went along to admire one of Ernst Lubitsch's last productions. It was Dragonwyck, a curious film in which characters from melodrama plagiarize themselves with (h)auteur and gesticulate with a solemnity equalled only on occasion by the severities of William Wyler. In France we have not yet seen The Late George Apley or Escape. But after Somewhere in the Night, the recent release in Paris of The Ghost and Mrs Muir, A Letter to Three Wives and House of Strangers suffices to to establish Joseph Mankiewicz as one of the most brilliant of American directors. I have no hesitation in placing him on the same level of importance as that held by Alberto Moravia in European literature.

Julius Caesar
Reviewed in the December 1953 issue of Cahiers de Cinema by Jean-José Richer in a double review with David Bradley's 16mm version of the Shakespeare's work from 1950. Richer's critique discusses Shakespeare for two long paragraphs before it mentions Mankiewicz (or Bradley). (page 46, excerpt my translation)
Mankiewicz is described as the "celebrated director revealed by A Letter to Three Wives" and confirm by All About Eve. Richer then goes on to say:
A seeming absence of imagination can conceal a most rich inner meaning. And, it is necessary to be on guard against hasty conclusions. Mankiewicz is not Welles; and it pleases him to cast out from the tragedy its spells, to disregard its penumbras, to shun the unformed, everything in short which fascinates the latter - in order to press it in a sharp lighting. Nothing prevents it.

The Barefoot Contessa
The July 1955 issue of Cahiers du Cinema feature four reviews of this film, from Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, François Truffaut, Philippe Demonsablon and Claude Chabrol, of The Barefoot Contessa appeared. Each of these four critics would list the film on their 10 Best Films of 1955.Jacques Doniol-Valcroze (page 40, excerpt my translation)
Must one be reminded of the staging points towards this work, Dragonwyck, Somewhere in the Night, The Ghost and Mrs Muir, Escape, The Late George Apley, A Letter to Three Wives, House of Strangers, No Way Out, All About Eve, People Will Talk, 5 Fingers, Julius Caesar? Maybe this is to remark that - on first view - the side "unrestrained" of Contessa can be found only in Dragonwyck. But on second view? The fragile and tenacious wall of the reality of common sense is crossed joyously and, to the advantage of a curious neo-romanticism in The Ghost and Mrs Muir and, above all, in the extraordinary People Will Talk. Indeed, an irony more or less latent treads its way underneath all his films. But, an anxious irony,facilely melancholy, and, often grave; and isn't this irony a modesty behind which the solid and imperturbable Joe, as his friends call him, hides a poetic and humane sensibility, which, when it finally finds expression, takes on romantic and flamboyant accents that clash loudly with the realistic and conventional norms of the cinema of today? It is thus that Contessa has the further merit of shedding light on the rest of his work and making for its consideration in a new fashion.
François Truffaut (page 41, excerpt my translation)
Seeing A Letter to Three Wives again recently, I perceived that I can no longer overlook Joseph Mankiewicz; vivid content, an intelligence where the whole is but elegance, tastefulness and refinement, content almost diabolical with precision, savior-faire and knowledge, a theatrical direction of actors to the point of impact, a sense of the timing of shots and of the efficiency of effects, that is to be found elsewhere nowhere but in the works of Cukor. All this is the art of Joseph Mankiewicz, his perfect mastery of a genre which limitations it is not yet befitting to outline since its qualities are too often ignored.
Note 658 in Eugene Walz François Truffaut : a guide to references and resources summarizes thusly the review which Truffaut contributed to the June 29 1955 issue of the weekly Arts:
"Barefoot Contessa", the portrait of a woman in four different situations, is the kind of that is either accepted or rejected in toto. Truffaut accepts it for its novelty, intelligence and beauty.
Philippe Demonsablon (page 44, excerpt my translation)
As Le Carosse d'or, The Barefoot Contessa opens many doors partway; it is attempting to find the one which leads the furthest, gleaming of numerous facets, it is attempting to the find the one which projects the most penetrating light,. To count the facets, to enumerate the doors, and to try the keys, and, even, to lift out the boxes of this game, each of which contains a larger one. I do not believe that one could succeed in rendering an account of the singular beauty of this work. It does not define itself through the sum of its elements.
Claude Chabrol (page 45, excerpt my translation)
Does The Barefoot Contessa mark the ruin of the Cartesian spirit? The French public falls into the trap of interpretation, and, into that other one, which is not excused of literary references. It falls into the trap of its own folly, clamoring for adult films and then sneering like a cabdriver when it sees one.
In the February 1956 issue of Cahiers du Cinema, Jacques Siclier contributed a critique which compared The Barefoot Contessa and Max Ophuls Lola Montès. Excerpted from that article (page 46, my translation)
The parallel with Mankiewicz's work which had enchanted us at the beginning of last summer is astonishing. The refined intellectualism of The Barefoot Contessa and the Baroque frenzy of Lola Montès would seem to have no common measure. Yet, in a different manner and spirit, both directors in the end show the same things, to the point that both portraits seem to have an identical model.
Among the younger critics at Cahiers who submitted 10 Best Films list for 1955, Charles Bitsch, Claude Chabrol, Philippe Demonsablon, Jean-José Richer, Eric Rohmer and François Truffaut cited The Barefoot Contessa. Jacques Rivette was the only representative of that group not to cite the film. 5 of the remaining 10 lists - from Alexander Astruc, Henri Agel, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Claude Mauriac and Alain Resnais - also cited the film. The lone Positif critic to post a list, Ado Kyrou, did not cite the film, nor did he cite Lola Montès. He did, however, cite The Creature from the Black Lagoon.

Thumbnail from December 1955 "Situation of American Cinema" special issue (page 56, uncredited, my translation)
The contessa went out at 5 o'clock; she was barefoot. To envisage the contribution of a Giradouxesque filmmaker, Joseph Mankiewicz has to be added to Jean Cocteau. Like Max Ophuls, Mankiewicz is bedevilled by woman and women, by Eve and Ava, their advocate, confidante, coaxer and exponent. Let them be fallen, scoffing, plotting, under-handed, his heroines are entitled all of his consideration, concern, sympathy and, let us say it, love. At last, a filmmaker who loves women and does not hide it! Up until Contessa, he was, for us, the most adroit maker of dramatic comedy, a Cukor who would be his own Kanin, a Lubitsch who has read Moravia. That is considerable! But since the contessa stripped off her shoes, all more to fire us up, Adam sees himself tempted with the golden apple by new and over-tanned Eve. An oeuvre such as that of Mankiewicz quickly finishes off the simple-minded legend according to which intelligence, elegance and urbanity don't know how to bloom and flourish in Hollywood. The truth is that he loathes nothing so much as vulgarity, most of all, Hollywood-style... Virile and distinguished, lucid and refined, accomplice of our mates and chronicler of the couple, Joseph Mankiewicz is our bedside filmmaker.

Guys and Dolls
Reviewed by Louis Marcorelles in the January 1957 issue of Cahiers du Cinema. (page 46, excerpt my translation)
Nevertheless, Guys and Dolls written and directed (produced this time by the veteran Samuel Goldwyn) by that prince of smooth talkers, Joseph Mankiewicz, seems to break with a firmly established tradition and mark the intrusion of an uncustomary irony into the genre. Mankiewicz wishes to make both All About Eve and The Bandwagon at once. That is, to blend the New York sophistication of the former with the contagious liveliness and lack of ulterior motive of the latter. His film is maybe only a half success.
In the conseil des dix, among the 2 "young turk" critics sitting, Eric Rohmer gave the film 1 star while François Truffaut bulleted it. The co-editors of Cahiers also participated in the conseil; Jacques Doniol-Valcroze gave the film 3 stars while André Bazin gave it 2 stars. Among, non-Cahiers members of that panel, Pierre Braunberger, Henri Agel and Jacques de Baroncelli gave the film 2 stars, France Roche and J-P Vivet gave it 1 star while Georges Sadoul bulleted the film.
The film appears on no 10 Best Films list.

The Quiet American
Note: The French title for the film is Un Américain bien tranquille which translates as "a really quiet American".
About one year before the release of The Quiet American in France, in its July 1957 issue, Cahiers du Cinema spotlighted the film in its "Photo of the Month" feature printing a photo from the set of the film and a short article by Raymond Jean commenting on the secrecy surrounding the screenplay.
In the August 1958 issue, the film was reviewed by co-editor Eric Rohmer. It begins (page 46, excerpt my translation):
This film is admirable and rightly deserves a disclaimer. Whoever speaks of the politique des auteurs speaks of fidelity, and, indeed, it is easier and more tempting to put one's faith in a man than in a system. Thus, you should not be to astonished to see me take the opposite view of an opinion, expressed here by me, some while ago, apropos of Les Girls. No film in Cahiers has made as much ink flow as The Barefoot Contessa and nevertheless, the cinema which we ordinarily defend in this magazine - a cinema of spatial construction and corporeal expression as our old friend André Martin would say - has barely any relation with that which that which Mankiewicz proposes to us. Even Bergman whose Secrets of Women calls to mind A Letter to Three Wives is quite distant from him.

And five pages later, it ends (page 51, excerpt my translation)
Let's keep ourselves from hasty definitions. Could we have believed, for example, that our old companion, mise-en-scene, would conceal itself behind the mantle of word-play?
Rohmer would proceed to give the film 4 stars on the conseil des dix and to place the film at the top of his list of the "10 Best Films for 1958". (He place Bergman's Secrets of Women 5th.)
Jean-Luc Godard also gave the film 4 stars on the conseil des dix and placed the film at the top of his 10 Best Films list for 1958.
From review published in Arts and reprinted in Godard on Godard critical writings by Jean-Luc Godard / edited by Jean Narboni and Tom Milne (their translations, excerpts pages 82-84).
But, after all, does Joseph L. Mankiewicz make films for the average spectator? Earlier films like A Letter to Three Wives and People Will Talk, and more recently All About Eve, and The Barefoot Contessa in particular, would seem proof to the contrary. In any case these films finally established their director as the most intelligent man in all contemporary cinema. This reputation is merely confirmed by The Quiet American. In turn scriptwriter, producer, director, and then all of them together, Mankiewicz is an all-around athlete who has more than one trick up his sleeve....But it so happens that in Joseph L. Mankiewicz we have the Giraudoux of the camera, and all is not as well as it should be. Writing Pour Lucrece is one thing, filming it another....This is the complaint one might make about Mankiewicz: that he is too perfect a writer to be a perfect director as well. Basically, what is missing from The Quiet American is cinema. It has everything - brilliant actors, sparkling dialogue - but no cinema....What a fantastic film Aldrich - not to mention Welles - would have made of this fine script which improves a hundred per cent on Graham Greene's novel. But Mankiewicz probably got so much enjoyment from the writing that there was little enough left for filming it. Though a matter for regret, The Quiet American is still the most interesting film about for this moment.
Five other "young turk" critics participated on that conseil des dix panel: besides the 4 stars from Rohmer and Godard, Charles Bitsch, Jean Domarchi, Robert Lachenay (most probably, François Truffaut) and Jacques Rivette gave the film 3 stars. Among the 4 other panelists that month: Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Henri Agel gave the film 2 stars, Georges Sadoul bulleted the film and Pierre Braunberger abstained.
Besides Rohmer and Godard, among "young turk" critics, Claude Beylie, Charles Bitsch, Philippe Demonsablon, Luc Moullet and Jacques Rivette all place the film on their list of the "10 Best Films for 1958". Jacques Demy who was then still an aspiring director who kept company with the "young turk" critics but did not himself write criticism also placed the film on his list for 1958. The lone non-Cahiers French critic among those who posted their lists to Cahiers who cited the film was Henri Agel.

In the April 1960 issue of Cahiers du Cinema, in a review of the newly released film Breathless, Luc Moullet wrote this: (page 30, my translation)
Godard made these two films [Une histoire d'eau and Charlotte et Véronique, ou Tous les garçons s'appellent Patrick] after having admired The Quiet American which inspired in him, in part, this renewal through dialogue and a taste for vertiginous construction.

Suddenly, Last Summer
This film was reviewed in the May 1960 issue of Cahiers du Cinema by Philippe Demonsablon. The discussion of the film in this review is more as a work of Tennessee Williams whose one-act play the film is based on and who is credited as co-writer of the screenplay with Gore Vidal who is never mentioned in the review. However, in considering Mankiewicz's contribution to the film, Demonsablon writes this: (page 56, excerpt my translation)
Everything about this ending of Suddenly, Last Summer demonstrates the diversity of Mankiewicz's talent which one would be wrong to limit to brilliance and intelligence. It reveals in him a poetic vein elsewhere severely constrained. The image of evoked memories frees itself at one time from photographic precision and literary symbolism reaching pure hallucination, much as the lived past rises again in Faulkner's novels. Let us not fear to venture this comparison: it expresses the magnitude of an auteur who, for a long while, has been our bedside filmmaker.
The verdict of the conseil des dix as regards the film was: among Cahiers regulars, Jean Douchet gave the film 3 stars, Luc Moullet gave it 2 stars, Fereydoun Hoveyda and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze gave it 1 star, while Louis Marcorelles and Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. Among the others on that panel: Pierre Marcabru gave the film 2 stars, Jacques de Baroncelli gave it 1 star and Jean-Pierre Melville and Claude Mauriac bulleted the film.
The film was nominated to the 10 Best Films of the year lists of Henri Agel, Philippe Demonsablon, Jean Domarchi, and Jean Douchet.

For the Dec1963/Jan1964 special issue of Cahiers du Cinema on American Cinema, this thumbnail critique of Joseph Mankiewicz was provided by Jean Douchet. (my translation.)
And the word was made Mankiewicz, who bases his direction entirely on the energy of the word. It is the vehicle of the extreme intelligence which his characters live, ands he motivates them to mark with an indelible imprint, through the construction of a durable body of work, their passage through this world. But it also remains the instrument which allows these mediocrities to warp the wall of plots, counter-plots, and machinations stand in the way of their plans. It is, above all, a tangible sign of the times which promotes the dissolution of a sumptuous construction built on the sands of time. At the same time, the word, which is gesture, acts and it loses itself in the brouhaha of that which is opposed to it before it steals away. It is magical (from whence the fact that all Mankiewicz's films are in flash-backs or reminiscences) and, in that way, illusion. This vehicle without which man can not be, reveals itself to be his worst enemy. Off-shoot of silence, the word is the pathetic and trifling proof of his existence: a murmuring rising up into the universe to signal the presence of a being whose grandeur comes from the avowal of his frailty. Such is Mankiewiecz, the cinematic virtue of the word.

Cleopatra
Reviewed in the March 1964 issue of Cahiers du Cinema by Jean-Louis Comolli (page 35, excerpt my translation
The function of the word - And, firstly, (pushing aside an immediate platitude) the word in the work of Mankiewicz, as, in the work of all great filmmakers is not an end, but, among others , a means. Where, then, is the heart of the matter? What counts more than it, first off, for Mankiewicz (as - oddly enough ? - for Godard) (both of whom, nevertheless, make profuse use of it) is the measure more or less asserted of the presence or absence of a being in face of others and also in face of its creations and its dreams. Let's observe that these variations of presence and absence, of assurance and effacement, of an advent and a vanishing constitiute from the very fact of image in motion, the lone topic specifically cinematic.
On the conseil des dix, among the Cahiers contingent, Jean Douchet gave the film 4 stars, Jean-Luc Godard gave it 2 stars while Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. Among the non-Cahiers contingent, Jean Collet gave the film 3 stars, Jean-Louis Bory gave it 2 stars, Jean de Baroncelli and Albert Cervoni gave it 1 star while Positif's Robert Benayoun bulleted the film as did Georges Sadoul.
The film shows up on the 10 Best Films of the year lists of Pierre-Richard Bré, Jean-Louis Comolli, Jacques Demy, Jean Douchet, Michel Mardore and Bertrand Tavernier.


Labels: , , , ,

Friday, December 19, 2008

Cahiers du Cinema, the young turks and Jerry Lewis 1954-1968

This is a compendium of the views and reviews of the films of Jerry Lewis as published in Cahiers du Cinema between 1954 and 1968.

Scared Stiff (Fais-moi peur [Frighten Me]) (George Marshall)
Cahiers du Cinema Nov 1954 "Films released in Paris" page 61 (my translation)
The usual clowning of two half-wits of American film. Strictly for their fans.
Cahiers du Cinema Jan 1955 "Films released in Paris" page 59 (my translation)
New comico-frightening adventures of Martin and Lewis. Lizabeth Scott is fetching in a long chemise.
For some odd reason, this film was listed twice in the "Films released in Paris" section.

The Caddy (Amour, délices et golf [Love. Delights and Golf]) (Norman Taurog)
Cahiers du Cinema May 1955 "Films released in Paris" page 62
So far as it concerns golf, it is not very convincing. What is the beautiful Donna Reed doing on these grounds. A little sympathy.

Money from Home (Un galop du diable [A Devil's Gallop]) (George Marshall)
Cahiers du Cinema Dec 1954 "Films released in Paris" page 60
A pair of nitwits even more nitwit than all the others. George Marshall is not Griffith but he does deserve better than this.

Living it up (C'est pas une vie, Jerry! [That's Not Life, Jerry]) (Norman Taurog)
I found no evidence of this film in the "Films released in Paris" or the conseil des dix features of Cahiers du Cinema.

3 Ring Circus (Le Clown est roi [The Clown is King]) (Joseph Pevney)
Cahiers du Cinema June 1955 "Films released in Paris" page 59
Our two comedians in a traveling circus.

You're Never Too Young (Un pitre au pensionnat [Class Clown]) (Norman Taurog)
Cahiers du Cinema Jan 1957 "Films released in Paris" page 62 no blurb
In an addendum to the March 1957 "Films released in Paris" feature,
Numerous gags, too often restrained by the director.
Not considered by the conseil des dix

Artists and Models (Artistes et modèles [Artists and Models]) (Frank Tashlin)
Reviewed by Jean-Luc Godard in the August-September 1956 issue page 46 (my translation)
Godard reviewed both this film and The Lieutenant Wore Skirts which was also directed by Frank Tashlin. Jerry Lewis is not mentioned once in his review. This review marked Godard's return to Cahiers after an almost four year hiatus, most of which he spent back home in the area of Geneva Switzerland .
It can be witnessed that Tashlin keeps the best remembered of Lubitsch, that of Cluny Brown and To Be or Not To Be. American comedy is dead. So be it. Long live American comedy.
In the conseil des dix, among the Cahiers regulars, Jacques Rivette and François Truffaut gave the film 2 stars. André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Pierre Kast gave it 1 star. Eric Rohmer abstained. Non-Cahiers
panelists broke thusly, Simon Dubreiulh gave the film 2 stars, Pierre Braunberger gave it 1 star and Henri Agel and George Sadoul abstained.

Pardners (Le Trouillard du Far West [The Yellow-belly of the Far West]) (Norman Taurog)
Cahiers du Cinema Feb 1958 "Films released in Paris" page 63
Classic burlesque. Jerry Lewis's gags are better in intent than in workmanship.
Not considered by the conseil des dix.

Hollywood or Bust (Un vrai cinglé de cinéma [A real looney for movies]) (Frank Tashlin)
Jean-Luc Godard reviewed this film in the July 1957 issue (page 44) (excerpt my translation)
According to Georges Sadoul, Frank Tashlin is a second rank director because he has never filmed the remake of You Can't Take It With You or The Awful Truth. By me, my colleague's mistake is to take a too quickly closed door for an open one. It will be realized in 15 years that The Girl Can't Help It functioned, in its time, meaning today (1957), as a fountain of youth where the cinema of now, meaning tomorrow (1972) drew a renewal of inspiration.
Godard manages to mention Tashlin in all 7 paragraphs while only mentioning Dean Martin once and Jerry Lewis once.
In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars, Hollywood or Bust received 4 stars from Jacques Rivette, 3 stars from François Truffaut, and 2 stars from both Eric Rohmer and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze. The 6 non-Cahiers critics on that panel rendered the following judgments of the film. Two stars from Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunbarger, and J-P Vivet, One star from both Georges Sadoul and France Roche. Henri Agel was the only critic to bullet the film.
Hollywood or Bust was selected as one of the 10 Best Films of 1957 by 4 respondents: Claude de Givray, Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut and Paul Gegauff. That year Tashlin also released two non Martin-Lewis films; Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter? was cited on 11 Best Film List and The Girl Can't Help It was cited on 7.

The Delicate Delinquant (Le Délinquant involontaire [The Unwitting Delinquent]) (Don McGuire)
Cahiers du Cinema August 1958 "Films released in Paris" page 63 (my translation)
With Tashlin absent, Dean Martin's partner is not the equal of Fernandel on his worst day.
On the conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars, Charles Bitsch, Robert Lachenay (Truffaut?) and Eric Rohmer bulleted the film while Jean Domarchi, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Jean-Luc Godard and Jacques Rivette abstained. The tally of the non-Cahiers panelists is Henri Agel bulleted the film while Pierre Braunberger and Georges Sadoul abstained.

The Sad Sack (P'tite tête de trouffion) (George Marshall)
Reviewed in January 1959 by François Mars (page 68) (excerpt my translation)
As for Jerry Lewis, he offers us only the blundering flightiness of a mad dog. Lewis's misfortune is not losing Dean Martin; it is not being directed by Tashlin.
This film seems to have never been considered by the conseil des dix.

Rock-a-bye Baby (Trois bébés sur les bras [Three Babies on his Arms]) (Frank Tashlin)
Reviewed in June 1959 by Jean Domarchi (pp 55) (excerpts my translation)
No, this is not the best Tashlin. Maybe, a little through the fault of Paramount. Surely, through that of actor-producer Jerry Lewis....It can clearly be seen what the latter asked of Tashlin - less eccentricity and more sentiment....It seems that the syrupy Dean (I am speaking about the singer, not the actor) has taken possession of Jerry. This burden of trying to be Dean without ceasing being Jerry, forces us to consider greatly what Frank would have been able to do, if Jerry had made himself a little scarce.
In the conseil des dix, the film was awarded 3 stars by Charles Bitsch and 2 stars by Philippe Demonsablon, Jean-Luc Godard, Fereydoun Hoveyda, Luc Moullet, Jacques Rivette and Eric Rohmer while André Martin abstained. Jacques Demy who consorted with the "young turks", but only had one contribution published by Cahiers du Cinema, abstained. The only non-Cahiers critics on that panel, Henri Agel gave the film 2 stars.

The Geisha Boy (Le Kid en kimono [The Kid in the Kimono]) (Frank Tashlin)
Reviewed in Cahiers du Cinema in a letter from London by Louis Marcorelles in a column headlined ""Tashlin" page 41 (excerpt my translation)
By comparison to these crazies of film that Nicholas Ray and Leo McCarey are, Frank Tashlin seems like a very wise, conventional director and should we say rather classical but nevertheless who pleases in his latest film The Geisha Boy.
Reviewed by Fereydoun Hoveyda in Feb 1960 (excerpt my translation)
If Tashlin's new film doesn't succeed in erasing the memory of The Girl Can't Help It, Artists and Models, Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter? and Hollywood or Bust, it does reassure us, however, that the vitality of the auteur for an instant placed in doubt by the disappointing Rock-a-Bye Baby. More turmoil and less mawkishness permit us to savor again, in more than one place, the raciness and vertiginous inventions of the most prodigious gagmen of contemporary cinema. The screenplay might appear thin and annoying with this complex paternity which consumes Jerry since his break up with Dean. But the story is only a pre-text for Tashlin.
In the conseil des dix, Jacques Rivette, Luc Moullet and Louis Marcorelles gave the film 2 stars while Jacques Doniol-Valcroze abstained. Among non-Cahiers critics on the panel, Henri Agel gave the film 2 stars, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger and Georges Sadoul all gave the film 1 star. Pierre Marcabru bulleted the film and Claude Mauriac abstained.

Don't Give up the Ship (Tiens bon la barre, matelot [Hold the Tiller Firmly, Mate]) (Norman Taurog)
Cahiers du Cinema Feb 61 "Films released in Paris" page 61 (excerpt my translation)
This very conformist naval comedy returns us to the pre-Tashlin level of Jerry Lewis.
In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers critics, Jean Domarchi and Jean Douchet gave the film 1 star while both Louis Marcorelles and Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. As for the non-Cahiers critics on that panel, Henri Agel gave the film 1 star, Michel Aubriant, Pierre Marcabru, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul all bulleted the film and Jean de Baroncelli abstained.

Visit to a Small Planet (Mince de planète [Darn, What a Planet]) (Norman Taurog)
Cahiers du Cinema Jun 1961, Films released in Paris page 56 (excerpt my translation)
The inhabitant of the planet mentioned discovers love but as a voyeur. Ever since he has gone out on his own, Jerry Lewis no longer bases his films on homosexuality, but on powerlessness.
This film was not assessed by the conseil des dix.

The Bell Boy (Le Dingue du Palace [The Looney of the Palace]) (Jerry Lewis)
Cahiers du Cinema Aug 1961 reviewed in "Notes on other films" by François Mars (page 60 excerpt my translation)
Maladroit, on the minus side of its possibilities, The Bell Boy, none the less, opens the road up. A mediocre precursor is, maybe, as valuable as the most fineshed of successes. And it is agreeable to think that this new impetus furnished by a man who owes his commercial success only to outdated clowning and antediluvian gags and owes his success d'estime to the eminence of a great director who knows how to direct him.
In the conseil des dix, Jacques Rivette gave the film 2 stars, André Labarthe and Jean Douchet gave the film 1 star, and Eric Rohmer and Michel Delahaye both abstained. Among the five non-Cahiers, Morvan Lebesque, Michel Aubraint bulleted the film while Henri Agel and Jean de Baroncelli both abstained.This film was listed as one of the 10 best films of the year by Jean Domarchi, François Mars and Bertrand Tavernier

Cindefella (Cendrillon aux grands pieds [Cinderella with Big Feet]) Frank Tashlin)
Cahiers du Cinema Jan 1962 Reviewed in "Notes on other films" by François Mars (page 61 excerpt my translation)
Some gags, sprinkled throughout an hour and a half of viewing, would have convinced us of a failure, indeed a debacle. Now, concerning gags in Cindefella, there exist not one, not a single one. I have no choice, thus, to conclude there was a deliberate refusal. This film truly is a tragic film, a melodrama, intended as such by its auteurs, whose comic element is systematically discarded.
In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers critics, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer and Louis Marcorelles each gave the film 2 stars while Jean Douchet awarded it 1 star. The breakdown for the non-Cahiers critics is thus: Pierre Marcabru and Henri Agel gave the film 1 star, Michel Aubriant bulleted the film while Jean de Baroncelli and Claude Mauriac abstained.

The Ladies Man (Le tombeur de ces dames [The Stud for these Women]) (Jerry Lewis)
Reviewed by André S Labarthe in the lead article in June 1962 issue of Cahiers du Cinema (page 1, excerpt my translation)
If it is necessary to justify the following notes I will only say this: There exists an argument Lewis as there exists an argument W C Fields, an argument Groucho, an argument Chaplin or an argument Keaton. It is justly one of the most remarkable characteristics of comic heroes to have always presented themselves as an argument - as if laughter (and the psychologists are not mistaken here) immerse themselves deeper into the human soul than tragic or melodramatic heroes do. Yes, there is a depth to laughter but there is also a shame of laughter. From one to the next, the argument Lewis, to our mind, offers a good example.
Five panelists on the conseil des dix were Cahiers regulars: among them, Michel Delahaye gave the film 3 stars, Jacques Rivette, Jean Douchet, and André Labarthe gave it 2 stars, leaving Louis Marcorelles who abstained. The returns from the 5 non-Cahiers broke down like this: Pierre Marcabru gave the film 3 stars, Henri Agel and Michel Aubriant gave it 2 stars, Jean-Louis Bory gave it 1 star and Georges Sadoul contributed the lone bullet among the ten critics.
This film was listed on the 10 best films of the year by Jean Domarchi, André S Labathe. Pierre Marcabru, Michel Mardore, François Mars, Jacques Rozier, Jacques Siclier and Bertrand Tavernier.

The Errand Boy (Le Zinzin d'Hollywood [The Goofball of Hollywood]) (Jerry Lewis)
This film was reviewed in the "Notes on other films" section in the March 1963 issue of Cahiers du Cinema by Bertrand Tavernier (page 60, my translation.)
After having proven with The Ladies Man that he as well capable as each and everyone and better than anyone at directing an authentic burlesque-surrealistic masterpiece, Jerry Lewis returns with The Errand Boy to his first love: the conversion of an absurd scenario into a succession of gags without any logical sequence, a principle which he carried out in The Bellboy. (It is fitting here to note the relationship of these three titles: all define a character, as opposed by Chaplin's titles, for example.)
The Cahiers critics on the conseil des dix gave this film 3 stars - François Weyergans, 2 stars - Jacques Rivette and André S Labarthe while Eric Rohmer abstained. The accounting among the non-Cahiers critics was - 2 stars, Pierre Marcabru and Jean-Louis Bory, 1 star, Bernard Dort and Georges Sadoul, abstaining were Henri Agel and Jean de Baroncelli.
The Errand Boy was cited as one of the 10 Best Films of the year by Bertrand Tavernier

It'$ Only Money (L'Increvable Jerry [The Imperturbable Jerry]) (Frank Tashlin)
Reviewed by François Mars in the "Notes on other films" section of the June 1963 issue of Cahiers du Cinema (page 57, excerpt my translation)
The films produced and directed by Lewis himself, however revolutionary they may be, know in America a growing commercial success. and the passion which the auteur of The Bellboy brings to bear by going from audacity to audacity in each new production should not prompt him, it seems, to go backwards and submit to the influence of another. It'$ Only Money is a hybrid film, but one whose two auteurs, far from disputing jealously its paternity, each trying to impose his style at the expense of the other, passing the ball back and forth in a perfect altruism.
On the conseil des dix, among Cahiers reglars, Jacques Rivette gave the film 2 stars, and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Jean Douchet gave it 1 star. Among the non-Cahiers critics on that panel, Jean-Louis Bory gave the film 3 stars, Pierre Marcabru gave it 1 star and Henri Agel, Michel Aubriant, Bernard Dort, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul all abstained.

In its Dec63-Jan64 issue "American Cinema" special issue, Cahiers du Cinema printed thumbnail critiques of 121 American directors, including Jerry Lewis and Frank Tashlin.
Jean-André Fieschi was responsible for Tashlin's thumbnail. (page 170, my translation)
Now that Jerry Lewis has done himself right and with the good fortune that we know of the tradition that he could exist only through Tashlin, we can better evaluate the profit each returned to the other. Indeed, the relationship of these two creators was not one of submission, but one of complimentary inspiration and reciprocal accomplishment similar to the golden age of Donen-Kelly. Lewis was, undoubtedly, for Tashlin, the perfect magus of the irreal, the magical victim of publicity, comics and cinema who would morph into an astounding poetry. In brief, the subject and object dream of his caricatural virtues. Still, we have maybe to be responsive to the caricature. Thus, to the realistic, being detrimental to the qualities peculiarly non-sensical of the auteur (thus, the fantastic).
In fashioning his dishevelled mythology of god-objects (TV, cinema, machines, etc.) or of new goddesses (stars, idols, etc.) close to the out-of-order universe of the cartoon, Tashlin contributed to the creation of an other world. But, today, more and more, he sacrifices to an oneiric atmosphere, a nightmare from which (It'$ Only Money, The Man from the Diner's Club) or falsely fairy-tale (Cindefella), the other side of the mirror rather than its reflection.
André S Labarthe contributed the thumbnail for the director Jerry Lewis. (page 142, my translation)
The revelation of the last years and the unique case of on-sight transformation which we have been able to follow from the start. First, the period of adjustment. Jerry looks for his character, inventories his themes, runs after this famous point from which, as time goes go, his character will constantly draw its coherence. This is a time of testing, which, in spite of the signatures on the credits of minor hacks, Jerry, in a certain measure directs himself, through an intermediary character. Second, the period which we can henceforth speak of as the time of plenty, and, in which, the first signs are in the Tashlin films. The character is in perfect focus, the director knows how to cede to him the technical resources which he will henceforth have at his disposal; color, special effects, camera movement.
Today, it is possible to define Lewis's character, yet, it is not possible to define the respective roles of the director, the actor and the character which he embodies. But is not the key to this universe precisely this division? And is not his visage, metaphorically, the mirror?

The Nutty Professor (Docteur Jerry et Mister Love [Doctor Jerry and Mr Love]) (Jerry Lewis)
Reviewed in the May 1964 issue of Cahiers by Claude Ollier (page 40, my translation)
In the first three films he conceived and directed himself, Jerry Lewis easily pursued two endeavors closely dependent on each other or, quite the least, interdependent, tied by multiple threads to a common background. On one hand, the maturation of a character henceforth adult bearing in the direction of a incipience which consecrate not a threat of destruction, but a positive strenghtening, definitive of the characteristics gained; on the other, the elaboration of a universe tending towards a complete oneiric representation.
In the conseil des dix, this film, from Cahiers regulars received 4 stars from Jean Douchet and Jacques Rivette and 3 stars from Jean-Luc Godard and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze. The other critics on that conseil gave it: 4 stars, Robert Benayoun, 3 stars, Jean Collet and Jean-Louis Bory, 2 stars, Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul, abstained Albert Cervoni.
This film was listed on the 10 Best Films lists of Robert Benayoun, Pierre-Richard Bré, Jean-Louis Comolli, Michel Delahaye, Jean Douchet, Jean-André Fieschi, Claude de Givray, Jean-Luc Godard, Fereydoun Hoveyda, Pierre Kast, André S Labarthe, Pierre Marcabru, Michel Mardore, Jean Narboni, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Georges Sadoul, Barbet Schroeder, Bertrand Tavernier, Paul Vecchiali, and François Weyergans.

Who's Minding the Store? (Un chef de rayon explos [The Boss of the Exploded Department]) (Frank Tashlin)
Reviewed in the June 1964 issue of Cahiers by Serge Daney (page 57, my translation)
Because he (Tashlin) leaves for war with mock armament, he achieves only provisional success. This vision of a mechanical world, where the human is swallowed up little by little, infests and confuses his outlook with this difference - that the complicity (which bound him formerly to the world of comics exposed in Artists and Models) between man and machine, the inventor and the invented is no longer possible. The relationship is no longer one of submission but one of uncertainty: what machines gain in autonomy, man loses in maturity. It is this relationship which Tashlin pursues and encircles, making his cinema a clockwork cinema where only the passage from one order to another counts.
This film was awarded 3 stars on the conseil des dix by Cahiers staffer, Jean Douchet. His colleagues - Jacques Rivette, Jean-Louis Comolli and Michel Delahaye gave the film 2 stars. Among the non-Cahiers contingent of that panel, Robert Benayoun and Jean Collet gave the film 3 stars, Jean-Louis Bory gave it 2 stars and Michel Aubriant, Albert Cervoni and Georges Sadoul abstained.
Fereydoun Hoveyda and Serge Daney placed the film on their 10 Best Films lists.

The Patsy (Jerry souffre douleur [Punching-bag Jerry]) (Jerry Lewis)
Reviewed in the January 1965 issue of Cahiers by Jean-Louis Noames (page 146, my translation)
...a misunderstood and despised film, The Patsy has only one fault, that of coming after The Nutty Professor and of at no point resembling it....Let's start at the beginning. It was with Cindefella that Lewis's solitude was revealed for the first time. But circumstances were not set. Lewis, who ought to have directed the film, left the responsibility to Tashlin who succeeded in making only a bastard work of it, but also a fascinating one, to the extent that the converging aspirations of two dissimilar artists meet up with each other. Where Tashlin ends and Lewis begins, it is here that we find it.
Four Cahiers regulars sat on the conseil des dix panel which considered The Patsy: Jean Douchet gave the film 4 stars, Michel Delahaye and Jean-André Fieschi gave the film 3 stars and Jacques Rivette gave it 2 stars. Six non-Cahiers critics also sat on that panel: Robert Benayoun and Jean Collet gave the film 4 stars, albert Cervoni gave it 2 stars, while Michel Aubraint, Jean-Louis Bory and Georges Sadoul gave the film 1 star.The following put this film on their 10 Best List - Robert Benayoun, Pierre Braunberger, Michel Cournot, Serge Daney, René Gilson, Fereydoun Hoveyda, Jean Douchet, Jean-Louis Ginibre, Claude de Givray, Gérard Guégan, André S Labarthe, François Mars and Jean-Louis Naomes.

The Disorderly Orderly (Jerry chez les cinoques [Jerry among the Looneys]) (Frank Tashlin)
André Téchiné's review in April 1965 issue of Cahiers du Cinema begins, (page 71, my translation)
One always feels ill at ease watching Tashlin's films. Everything appears blindly subordinate to the mechanical.
Téchiné mentions Tashlin a total of 7 times and in every paragraph. Lewis is not cited until the 3rd paragraph and his name comes up only 2 times.
Jean-Louis Comolli gave film 4 stars, while Michel Delahaye and Jean-André Fieschi rounded out the bloc on that panel giving the film 3 stars. Robert Benayoun and Georges Sadoul, among the other panelists, gave the film 3 stars. Jean-Louis Bory, Jean Collet and Michel Cournot gave it 2 stars while Michel Aubriant gave the film a bullet, a rare occurence for a Lewis/Tashlin film.
This film appeared on the 10 Best Film list of: René Allio, Robert Benayoun, Jean-Pierre Biesse, Jacques Bontemps, Jean-Louis Bory, Pierre Kast, Jacques Robert, Jacques Rozier, Roger Tailleur, André Téchiné, and François Weyergans.

The Family Jewels (Les Tontons farceurs [The Madcap Uncles]) (Jerry Lewis)
In the February 1966 issue of Cahiers -- the Jerry Lewis special issue - short reviews by Claude-Jean Philippe, Sylvain Godet, Serge Daney and André Téchiné were published. (excerpts, my translation)
Serge Daney (page 37),
This is a serious film because never has the actor been so little sure of himself, so intimidated, he has just refused artifice, make-up, magic; he is going to appear such that he is and for what he is, he is going to run the risk of not being recognized.
Sylvain Godet (page 39),
To master the ecstasy that up until now has accepted no boundaries, to reach for the delights of conscious creation, such is Lewis's ambition.
André Téchiné (page 40)
In Lewis's world, as in that of Cocteau, one takes the good jinns for soulless jumping jacks and a retiring manner for uncommon acrobatics.
Claude-Jean Philippe (page 42)
First off, this is a reflection on laughter. There are those whom children like (the clumsy chauffeur, kind and a little ridiculous) and those whom they do not like (the selfish, cynical clown uncle who puts his savings in Switzerland and renounces the circus and his American citizenship). Put these two characters on either side of a mirror and you get the film in a nutshell.
That month's conseil des dix found Cahiers regulars Jacques Bontemps and Jean-André Fieschi giving the film 4 stars and Michel Delahaye giving it 3 stars. The tally for the other panelists was: Jean Collet, Robert Benayoun and Jean-Louis Bory gave the film 4 stars, Michel Cournot gave the film 3 stars, Albert Cervoni and Georges Sadoul gave the film 2 stars, and, finally, Michel Aubraint gave it 1 star.
The film appeared on the 10 best lists of Robert Benayoun, Jean-Pierre Biesse, Jean Collet, Jean-Louis Comolli, Michel Cournot, Michel Delahaye, Jean Douchet, Jean-André Fieschi, Folon, André S Labarthe, Claude Ollier, Claude-Jean Philippe, André Téchiné, Henri Chapier, Serge Daney, Claude de Givray, Sylvain Godet, François Mars, and Jean-Louis Naomes.

Boeing-Boeing (Boeing-Boeing) (John Rich)
Reviewed in the "Films Reased in Paris" June 1966 issue of Cahiers by Jean-André Fieschi (page 80, my translation)
Noteworthy exclusively for its negative and constrictive quality, by demonstrating the complete impossibility in which today the great Lewis, inserting himself even through fraud, in a universe other than his own. It is a comfort to confirm that the lower depths of French slapstick and farce are completely closed to him. So much the better.
Among the four Cahiers critics sitting on the panel which considered this film, André Fieschi and Michel Delahaye bulleted the film while Jean Narboni and Jean-Louis Comolli abstained. The tally of the six non-Cahiers
critics broke down thusly: Robert Benayoun gave the film 2 stars and Georges Sadoul gave the film 1 star. Jean-Louis Bory and Michel Cournot bulleted the film while Michel Aubraint and Albert Cervoni abstained.

Three on a Couch (Trois sur un sofa [Three on a Couch]) (Jerry Lewis)
Reviewed by Jean-Louis Comolli (Cahiers co-editor) in the January 1967 issue of Cahiers (pages 67-68, my translation)
Thus, here is the most constructed film of Lewis's; the one in which the comic technique best couples with the dramatic technique. This coherence, this substitution of the "serious" for the "demented" might be regretted. The "Bell Boy" gives way to the coordinator of plots and the ridiculous actor to the worried auteur. But the itinerary is magnificent.
In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars, Jean-Louis Comolli and Michel Delahaye gave the film 4 stars, while Jacques Bontemps and Michel Mardore gave it 3 stars. Among the non-Cahiers contingent on that panel, Jean-Louis Bory and Jean Collet gave the film 3 stars, Albert Cervoni and George Sadoul gave the film 2 stars, and Michel Aubriant and Jean de Baroncelli gave it 1 star. This film was listed as one of the 10 Best Films of the year by Jean-Louis Comolli, René Richetin and Jacques Robert.

Way...Way Out (Tiens bon la rampe, Jerry [Keep Hold of the Launchpad, Jerry]) (Gordon Douglas)
Reviewed in the January 1967 issue of Cahiers by Michel Mardore in the "Films released in Paris" section (page 73, my translation)
If Lewis is looking to prove, as in Boeing-Boeing, his aptitude for portraying "normal" characters, this performance aims at an abusive masochism.
In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars, Michel Delahaye and Jean Narboni bulleted the film and André Téchiné abstained. The non-Cahiers split like this: Jean-Louis Bory and Albert Cervoni gave the film 2 stars, Robert Benayoun, Henri Chapier and Georges Sadoul gave it 1 star, Michel Aubriant bulleted the film, and Jean de Baroncelli abstained.

Don't Raise the Bridge, Lower the River (Te casse pas la tête Jerry [Don't Overwork Yourself, Jerry]) (Jerry Paris)
Reviewed in the October 1968 issue of Cahiers by Patrick Brion in the "Films released in Paris" section (page 65, my translation)
This new item, after Boeing-Boieng (sic) - a European adventure [note: this film was shot in Portugal], from Lewis is even more disheartening than its predecessor. Encumbered by an awful screenplay, which one might believe had been written for Kenneth More, surrounded by bad comics and most of all crippled by a direction which does not even reach the level of t most mediocre comedies of the Paramount era, Lewis appears quickly disoriented and, more than that, uninterested by this grim comedy. But what else could be done here?
By September of 1968, when this film was released in Paris, Cahiers had abandoned the conseil des dix feature.

The Big Mouth (Jerry grande gueule [Jerry, The Big Mouth]) (Lewis)
The Christmas 1967/January 168 issue of Cahiers included a special section devoted to Jerry Lewis with an interview conducted by André Labarthe and Positif critic Robert Benayoun.
The refinements of construction, the physical-metaphysical reach of the slightest gag, the tidal wave of madness which bowls over the dimensions of space, time and cinema, force us to dedicate a special issue to their analysis. The Big Mouth marks the center of gravity, the inevitable outcome of the previous films of Lewis.

In the conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars Jean Narboni and Jacques Bontemps gave the film 4 stars, while Michel Delahaye and Michel Mardore gave it 3 stars. Among the non-Cahiers critics on that panel: Jean Collet and Jean-Pierre Leonardi gave the film 4 stars, Robert Benayoun gave the film 3 stars, Michel Aubriant and Henri Chapier gave the film 1 star and Jean de Baroncelli abstained.
The Big Mouth was cited as one of the 10 Best Films of the Year by Jacques Aumont, Robert Benayoun, Patrick Bensard, Charles Bitsch, Jacques Bontemps, Patrick Brion, Michel Ciment, Jean Collet, Jean-Louis Comolli, Serge Daney, Jean Douchet, Bernard Eisenschitz, Sylvain Godet, Gerard Guegan, Pascal Kané, Claude Ollier, Sylvie Pierre, Sebastien Roulet, Jacques Siclier, Roger Tailleur.


Labels:

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Another take on mise en scene

Watching the fifth season of the TV series The Wire on DVD with the French subtitles turned on, this translation interested me: At 9:45 in episode 3,

Jimmy McNulty says, "Well, maybe they need the make believe". This was rendered into French as, "Il leur faut une mise en scène."



Sunday, October 19, 2008

In the August-September 1954 issue of Cahiers du Cinema commenced a new monthly feature at the back of each issue called "Films released in Paris from 'x' date to 'y' date" where all the films released in Paris in the last month were listed and the films not reviewed by Cahiers were usually briefly commented on.
In the January 1965 issue, Cahiers recorded the release of Michel Deville's film Lucky Jo in the "Films released" feature with this comment,

A rather beautiful story, blandly told, of an unlucky gangster, who, full of good will, sets in motion the collapse of everything which he touches. In sum, a devilleienne autobiography. (
Cahiers du Cinema, January 1965, page 152, my translation)

In the March 1965 issue of Cahiers, the following two letters to the editor objecting to this short note were published on the "Cahiers des lecteurs" page.

The legitimate fears that many can have will vanish quickly, if you continue in this manner. "Yeye" will not destroy "Jazz Magazine", why will it kill
Cahiers?... What have you done to Deville? If you don't like him, don't put off others over it. This is a sensitive and elegant director and his Lucky Jo is a marvel of poetry and humanity. André Ondarsumu (Cahiers du Cinema, March 1965, page 5, my translation)
... I regret how there abides in some collaborators a sectarian state stripped of all objectivity. I am thinking precisely of the latest Chabrol, Le Tigre aime le chair fraiche, which was made the object of a laudatory column while the latest Deville, Lucky Jo, saw itself allotted a few ironic lines. Without being a masterpiece, this little film is clearly superior to that so-called "Chabrolesque de-Bondization" and, on that subject, you will have the pleasure to establish, if possible, a parallel with Goldfinger, notably for the sequence of the automobile compacter. J-L Couturier (Cahiers du Cinema, March 1965, page 5, my translation)

Cahiers responded

We have nothing against Deville. As proof, the laudatory reviews of Ce soir ou jamais, Adorable menteuse and À cause, à cause d'une femme... But, there was no one to be found at Cahiers to champion L'Appartement des filles or Lucky Jo. Thus, there is no necessity to conclude a general hostility towards Deville, even if appearances, this time are against us. Those who liked the film greatly (Truffaut, for example, or de Givray) were not in Paris for the publication of that issue. And the "list of films released from ... to ..." had to be compiled. That said, Mr Ondarsumu and Mr Couturier are correct in criticizing the accused notice for excessive harshness: meanwhile, several other letters were received from readers in the same sense. In the future, we will try to be less undeserved, or better to take responsibility for our arbitrariness. (cf. as concerns thhis regard, in the back [of that issue], the revision of "List of films..."

Labels:

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

In 1963, Cahiers du Cinema co-founder and former co-editor Jacques Doniol-Valcroze played the starring role in novelist and filmmaker Alain Robbe-Grillet's L'Immortelle. What follows is the beginning of the review of that film in the May 1963 issue of Cahiers in which J D-V who now only on rare occasion wrote for Cahiers explains how it happens that he is reviewing a film which he starred in.

That I am writing here about L'Immortelle is not beyond a certain indecorum. I realize that perfectly. So, I owe the reader an explanation. It is simple. No member of the staff at Cahiers, presently, agreed to take pen in hand other than to summarize the general opinion at Cahiers as Rohmer had gently forewarned me. "They seem to have mixed in some reels of Benazeraf's during the editing." The old rule at Cahiers that it is the one who likes the film who speaks of it, in preference to the one who did not like it should be sufficient reason since I am the only one for.
Cahiers du Cinema, May 1963, page 54 (my translation)


In May 1963's conseil des dix, among Cahiers regulars, the film was bulleted by Jacques Rivette and Jean Douchet while Doniol-Valcroze gave the film 3 stars. The non-Cahiers critics who participated on that panel ran the gamut in their assessments of the film: Claude Mauriac gave the film 4 stars, Jean-Louis Bory gave it 3 stars, Georges Sadoul 2 stars, Henri Agel and Bernard Dort both gave it 1 star while Michel Aubriant and Pierre Marcabru each bulleted the film.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Jean-Pierre Gorin on Manny Farber's death.

This is translated from a eulogy for Manny Farber which was published in Serge Toubiana's blog. Jean-Pierre Gorin taught Cinema at University of California at San Diego with Manny Farber.

I sent him [Jean-Pierre Gorin] an e-mail yesterday, simply as a gesture. Gorin quickly answered me. Let me reproduce a few lines from his e-mail which moved me greatly.
The night of his death was extraordinary. Patricia (Patricia Patterson, Manny Farber's wife, with whom he wrote several books on cinema) with his body in her arms. And Robert Walsh, Jyah Min and me around the bed. Laughter, silence, and again laughter. Few tears. An evening as he would have wanted. We looked at each other surprised by what was happening. Later, Patricia told me that this replicated the account which Manny had given her of the death of James Agee. And then the tasks of the dead.They held mourning with arms outstretched, banishing it in order to reclaim it with interest: mourning on the installment plan. Nothing has affected me yet, but I know the due date approaches.

Labels: ,

Monday, September 15, 2008

Pierre Billard on young French filmmakers -- Feb 1958

This is the conclusion written by Pierre Billard for the feature "40 less than 40" concerning young French filmmakers which appeared in the February 1958 issue of Cinema '58. This article is credited as being the first to apply the term "New Wave" to that generation. Although this was more than a year before The Four Hundred Blows would be released.

So here, considered one by one, are 40 youths on whom rests the destiny of tomorrow's French cinema. How not to recognize that this list, which we wanted yo be benevolent, scarcely inspires enthusiasm. And it does not suffice to bundle forty individuals tied by their birth certificates to constitute an academy, how to deny to our too mortal forty a generalized proclivity towards a disquieting academicism.
In fact, what is striking about these young people is their lack of youth. We would pass most gladly over the defects of their films if those defects resulted from an excess of enthusiasm, from haphazard and poorly managed research, from immoderate ambition, or from erroneous, but novel, aesthetic conceptions. The wisdom with which this "new wave" follows in the tracks of its elders is disconcerting. Undoubtedly, it will sometimes happen that they will beat the elders at their own game: these bitter victories are not those which we wish for them.

Among the young foreign filmmakers discovered in these last years, there is no one whose genius seems guaranteed and all their films are far from satisfying for us. But, there is something in
Kiss Me Deadly, The Big Knife, Attack (Aldrich, 1919), The Forty-first (Chukrai, 1922), Grand'Rue (Bardem, 1922), The House of the Angel (Torre Nilsson, 1925), Generation, Kanal (Wajda, 1927), Gli Sbandati, La Donna del giorno (Maselli, 1931), a passion, a desire to make films for, and, above all, against a certain order (moral, social, esthetic), an aspiration towards a thematic or formal renovation which appears to us YOUNGER [his capitals] than the knowing and empty mastery of the plupart of our "hopes".
Let's guard against condemnations, summary and too hurried. The only certainty about these forty names which we have gathered is that they do not constitute a generation (if what is meant by that is a collective phenomenon presenting some known characteristics) but a heterogeneous and inconsistent group of people manifestly the same age. Judging this group as a bloc, in STATISTICAL TERMS [his capitals], one is taken with an extreme strictness for the best, and thus lead to a MEDIUM [his capitals] value which denies the essence of their qualities. So it is these best alone that we would want to take into consideration to sketch out some conclusions. These conclusions will be completely false should we level a value judgment on our young filmmakers without taking into account the conditions in which they are led to create. In looking up from our biographies, our filmographies, our catalogings and our awards, we quickly see that we are proceeding to attribute to some the sins of all and forgetting the basic justification which explains today's situation.


I. The Conditions of production

The general conditions of film organization in France today are not favorable for the development of a new generation. Let us cite among some reasons:


---The non-existence of a sector of experimental production.


---The incoherence and absurdity of professional organization which increase the barriers and partitions between the specialties and organize employment into an extreme hierarchy, thus doing damage to the promotion of the most capable.


---The relative prosperity of the short film which, as much for economic as psychological reasons, holds the interest of such a number of the young (this factor is unfavorable only relatively to problem which occupies us today. It could be considered as beneficial in the long run).


---The character of current French production which is directing itself toward "international" co-productions in color with foreign stars and very high budgets are entrusted to men of high reliance rather than to the young.


---The absence of a spirit of exploration and risks by the producers who confide the majority of French production to an infinitely small group of talentless drudges. So it is than in the last 12 years around 100 films have directed by our 40 less than 40, being an average of two and a half films per director. During the same period, 167 films (about 20% of the total production) have been directed by 9 filmmakers (an average of fifteen and a half films per director): Berthomeiu (30 films), Stelli (22 films), Boyer (21 films), Pottier (18 films), Vernay (17 films), Labro (17 films), Lepage, de Canonge, Raoul André (14 films).


III. The manner of the times

Able, master technicians, virtuosos of their first films, our young filmmmakers have nothing more to learn on the plane of METIER [his capitals]. They even would know it rather too well and some from among them don't shy away from old trickery.
But this technical qualification, this professional mastery, is exercised most often in the void: comedies are sometimes comical but never satirical, and dramas, if should remove manner, nothing remains any longer. And isn't this vacuity astonishing among creators who were between 15 and 20 during the "phony war" and 20 to 25 at the Liberation? If it knew the difficulties, the sufferings, the enthusiasms of this period, this generation was above all formed during the years 45-55, those of great abandon. They have left it as a part of today's intellectual youth, lucid and bitter, but disenchanted and no longer believing in anything, not even its revolt. It has seen overhauled Gods founder, the old lose their nerve, the promises of other times denied: yielding to the fashion of the day, it amuses itself in "demystifying" the latest illusions. This painful test of truth is possibly salutary for a renewal: it is hardly favorable to creation.

The same as in the theatrical domain, the multiplicity of enthusiastic and inventive young troupes is accompanied by a total sterility of dramatic creation. The harm is easily surmounted for, from Shakespeare to Brecht, the repertory offers temporary and exciting compensations. In the literary domain, the progress is more advanced and a new orientation of fiction is already being outlined by, for example, Michel Butor, Marguerite Duras, Claude Simon, and Alain Robbe-Grillet. Conditions particular to film production render the refinement of new forms, of new themes, better in accord with our preoccupations, our sensibilities more difficult. One can divine its first fruits, however, in the sensuality of Vadim and Brabant, in the critical anarchism of Boissol, Carbonnaux, in the study of ambition in the work of Astruc, in the freer, more sincere, moer modern relations between men and woman in the work of Astruc, Vadim, Kast and Varda.


III. In the trough of the wave

And this leads us to a confession: it is that without doubt the moment was curiously chosen for a assessment of young French cinema. In fact, all this leads us to believe that under the accumulated effect of the causes which we have spoken of, we are currently in the trough of the wave, and, that the disappointments and renunciation of today will be succeeded by more positive experiences. These will come first off, undoubtedly, from the small academy we have examined today, and above all, if it is necessary to speak of the future, from Astruc, Vadim, Joffè, Molinaro and Malle. But other men who threaten to pull chestnuts out of the fire.


--- The Gods of Television, from which most harmonious film-TV relations permit exchanges.


--- Those of the short film: The announcement, for example, of the forthcoming creation of a co-operative of production which will gather some of the best documentarians around Alain Resnais and Henri Fabiani, is it not full of promise?


--- Those of Cahiers du Cinema: The half aborted attempt of Rivette (
Le Coup du Berger), the successful one of Truffaut (Les Mistons) and the forthcoming feature from Chabrol (Le Beau Serge), all undertaken in independent production, don't they stand the chance of ending in interesting revelations?


No, finally, this stocktaking comes well to its end, less through what it observes than through what it announces. 1958 can be, must be for the young French cinema, the year of resounding confirmations, of unexpected flowerings, of lightning revelations. Or else...


Pierre Billard "40 less than 40" Cinema '58 February 1958 (my translation)

Labels: ,

Saturday, September 06, 2008

Agnès Varda answers Cinema '58 enquery

In Pierre Billard's article "40 less than 40" in the February 1958 issue of Cinema '58, the editors asked 11 directors to respond to 8 questions. One of those 11 was Agnès Varda. (Strangely, Marcel Camus who by virtue of having been born in 1912 was not one of the 40 was one of the 11, also.) Here are Varda's answer to that inquest.

What are the films which the most striking in your memory?
Varda: L'Age d'or, Le Vampyr (Dreyer), The White Sheik,
Greed.

Who is your favorite director (French of foreign)?
Varda:
Fellini

Who is the young French director from whom you expect the most?
Varda:Resnais, and I am still expecting...

Who is your favorite writer?
Varda: Faulkner - Pavese - Genet


Who is your favorite composer, painter or playwright?
Varda: Picasso - Chekhov - Ionesco


Among the different pressures of cinema (economic, social, psychological, technical, etc.), which seem to you the most constraining?
Varda: The economic one and also the psychological pressure due to the "public".


Do you have the feeling of belonging to a cinematographic generation presenting a certain cohesion? If yes, how can one try to define it?
Varda: To a generation - yes - of filmmakers difficult and a little grating - but cohesive - no.


For what reasons have you chosen a film career?
Varda: Did not choose the career, but making films seems to me more difficult than the rest, more entertaining, more tempestuous.



Labels: ,

The original New Wave

In the French news-weekly L'Express in 1957, Françoise Giroud introduced the term "new wave" to designate the emerging generation in France. In February 1958, Pierre Billard in an article entitled "40 less than 40" in Cinema '58 (a publication of the Federation française des cineclubs which had about 3 or 4 times the circulation of Cahiers du cinema or Positif) first applied the term to cinema. What follows here is a list of the 40 directors considered "new wave" in this first discussion of them subject. NOTE: Alain Resnais, Chris Marker and some others did not make the list because they were considered as directors of short films.

[birth year unknown] Pierre Chevalier, Jean-Claude Roy, André Pergamet [1918] Norbert Carbonneuax, Jean Mousselle, Alex Joffé, Paul Cadéac, Claude Barma [1919] Guy Lefranc, Roger Pigaut [1920] Patrice Dally, Jean Bastia, Henri Verneuil, Claude Boissol, Charles Brabant, Louis Félice, Pierre Kast, Yves Robert [1921] Denys de La Patellière, Michel Boisrond, Yves Ciampi, Pierre Gout [1922] Maurice Delbez, Gérard Philippe, Maurice Régamey [1923] Alexander Astruc, Jack Pinoteau, Robert Ménegoz [1924] Pierre Cardinal, Bernard Borderie [1925] Claude Lalande [1928] Robert Hossein, Roger Vadim, Agnès Varda, Serge Bourgiognon [1930] Claude-Bernard Aubert [1932] Louis Malle


Labels: ,

Monday, August 11, 2008

Truffaut's first beef

François Truffaut review of the film Sudden Fear in the March 1953 issue of Cahiers du Cinema marked his first appearance in that revue. For the June 1953 of Cahiers, Truffaut wrote a short piece on errors in books dealing with film. Specifically, he dealt with an error in Jean Queval's monograph Marcel Carné. The quarrel that Truffaut proceeded to become embroiled in with Quéval would be the first brouhaha of his career as a critic. It is interesting that in his original piece Truffaut never names Quéval as the culprit. Also, much as A Certain Tendency would use an idea of Andre Bazin's as its springboard ("After Robert Bresson, Aurenche and Bost are the Viollet-le-Duc of French cinema."), here Truffaut also uses a Bazin quote ("Do we need to burn books on film?") as a springboard. The difference being that in this case, Bazin was writing under the pseudonym, Florent Kirsch.
The following is Truffaut's short piece and Quéval's letter to Cahiers along with Truffaut's answer to that letter.

Truffaut's short piece which was printed in Books on Cinema in June 1953 issue of Cahiers du Cinema (page 61, my translation)

The complaints are daily, concerning the difficulty of making good use of books specializing in cinema.
Rarely is the question addressed from the point of view -- essential it seems to me -- of the value of these works and of their critical or historical authority.
I open a book dedicated to Marcel Carné. I note that the author has been guided alone by the consideration of undermining the prestige of this director; now, as it happens, I bought this book to move forward in the knowledge of a filmmaker I admire. Let's admit that the intent of this book was to make me become aware of the immoderacy of my admiration for Marcel Carné. But, why is it written in this same book, "The negative of Nogent, Eldorado of dimanche has burned and there no longer exist any copies of this film." It happens that I frequent the Cinémathéque française and that every year, I see Nogent, Eldorado of dimanche there.(1) How then, if I thinking also of a rather thick and quite recent book where I read, "After Faust, Murnau filmed Tartuffe". Although Faust is from 1925 and Tartuffe from 1925, how not to respond in the affirmative to the question raised in the past by Florent Kirsch, "Do we need to burn books on film?"

(1) A copy of Nogent, Eldorado of dimanche is the property of the Club des Cinéastes Amateurs. Meanwhile, this film has been shown many times at the Ciné-Club du Quartier Latin, at Cinéum and at the Cinémathéque. It is true that the critics rarely attend these places.


Quéval's letter (Cahiers du Cinema, August September 1953, page 64 my translation)

Dear Bazin, Dear Doniol
François Truffaut takes issue with a lot of people in your latest issue with the friendly arrogance of callow youth. My advice for him is a peaceful holiday in the fresh country air. But I am responding to him only in order that a fiction will be not become accredited. A great man, in my stead, will be the victim of a venomous iconoclast.
1) It is naive to think that I would dedicate a book to an important director so as to depreciate him. In reality, my first move was to request several interviews with him. It was not I who took to initiative to discontinue them. What followed from this rupture, others, in my position, would have made public, as a matter of self-defense. I have done nothing like this because I did not wish that the failings of the man tarnish the just and high repute of the artist. But, when François Truffaut attributes me with the intention of doing harm, the roles become reversed. 50 articles bear witness that, to the contrary, I endeavor to be unbiased, without letting myself win the wager through bad temper. Later on, a few months ago, Marcel Carné announced his intention to withdraw from film. I was, at that time, the only one in the press, make no mistake about it, to beg him not to do it.
2) François Truffaut bestows on himself an award for diligence in cinema. I will concede it to him. As for me, I generally believe what I am told. I was told, "There are no existing copies of Nogent, Eldorado du dimanche and the negative has been destroyed". I wrote, "There are no existing copies of Nogent, Eldorado du dimanche and the negative has been destroyed". My source was Marcel Carné.
Yours, Jean Quéval

Truffaut's reply (Cahiers du Cinema, August September 1953, page 64 my translation)

Dear Bazin, Dear Doniol
Jean Quéval, Normand critic, bestows on himself a prize for being unbiased which I would never dream of contesting, but, instead, it is true of criticizing him for. In the accusation which I leveled -- with coarseness of "callow youth" -- the notion that it is useless to write a book about a director -- and without doubt, more in general, one about an auteur --whom one does not admire enough to be deliberately biased. That Marcel Carné does not know that copies of Nogent, Eldorado du dimanche are extant is of scarce importance, his metier not being to view his films for those who have to explain them to others. Still historians know criticism of witnesses distinguishes the intrinsic from the extrinsic. I will hold though that the error would be, in itself, of little importance had Jean Quéval avoided it by looking to find the first film of his auteur. It is true that having seen (I think) Le Jour se lève did not prevent him from having Jules Berry go out into the street to die (page 39). The fault is harmless, but one like that of a lover so "unbiased" as to brag about his mistress's beauty spot while being mistaken on her breasts.
Must I add that if Jean Quéval has been the only one in the press a few weeks before the filming of Thérèse Raquin began to beg Marcel Carné not to abandon film, maybe, proves, above all, in the end, that he is also the only one to believe what they tell him?
Yours, François Truffaut

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 04, 2008

Eric Rohmer on Jacques Prévert

This is a translation of a review of Jean Quéval's Jacques Prévert written Eric Rohmer that was published in Cahiers du Cinema for December 1956.



Only half of this book concerns us. We'll leave aside the poet of Paroles and consider the filmmaker only. Fimmaker, indeed, Jean Quéval thinks so and, as him, we think that that term is not at all far-fetched. "Prévert possesses more reality than other directors and scriptwriters. A single detail, which Roger Leenhardt points out to us, would say it. 'No one other than he himself ever wrote the dialogue for his scenarios. . .Just try to draw up a list of the films of a screenwriter, its incoherence will make you laugh.' As for Prévert, he stands up to the producers, sets the terms for himself, he is for real." He was the most stellar personality of the 30s and 40s. Les Amants de Vérone and Lumière d'été have more resemblance to each other than either of these films have with the respective work of [André] Cayatte or [Jean] Grémillon. "This is no mise-en-scene," adds Jean Quéval, "except if there is a metteur-en-scene". Metteurs-en-scene, that which we had the greatest lack of during the reign of Prévert, if we make an exception for [René] Clair -- already rather winded -- and Jean Renoir. "The case of Jean Renoir is enlightening. The only film he directed from a Prévert script, "Le Crime de Monsieur Lange", is commonly regarded (but Nana, Boudu sauvé des eaux, La Chienne, and La Règle de jeu etc. have reputations as secure) with all its weaknesses and its admirable moments as one of his best. Taking off from this, Jacques Brunius wrote 'The combination Renoir-Prévert -- presuming that the impact of both these tumultuous personalities would permit combination -- should have been able to furnish French cinema some beneficial salvos.' " But Quéval reminds us that it transpires there is an adaptation of Partie de campagne written by Prévert. "This is admirable", Renoir would say "But I haven't anything left to do." Yes, such was this the most suitable metteur-en-scene to put Prévert on film; not [Jean] Grémillon, as is affirmed here. Grémillon "the unfortunate genius of French cinema" (but, it has to be said,that he owes his misfortune to himself), nor his brother Pierre either. The author sketches out a defense of L’Affaire est dans le sac, Adieu Léonard and Voyage surprise which does not easily convince us. Let's pass over the first film whose schoolboy awkwardness merits sympathy. The latter two would have yielded something taken in hand by a [Vicente] Minnelli, but we did not have, we do not have, in France, any Minnelli. And neither gentility nor the best intentions in the world (but were they so good?) have ever taken the place of talent. Let's pass over Marc Allegret's L’Hôtel du libre échange, Pierre Billon's Le Soleil a toujours raison and other poverty-row Prévert, let's pass over Les Amants de Vérone possibly the most grandiose of all his films, but not the best. There remains [Marcel] Carné and I ask myself if this "superb painter" was not the best collaborator which our scenarist could have dreamed of. Poet, poet of cinema, indeed, but "man of the word" as Roger Leenhardt says, he needed only, all accounting done, a good illustrator. One can be claimed, as Barthélemy Amengual does, that Prévert is "in the images" of his films, quite, as much, as in the dialogue. But it still it is necessary to prove it - which can scarcely be done here - if only be done by citing the script of Les Amants de Vérone in which a silent scene is described. Of course, Pierre is a "visual", but three-quarters of novelists and playwrights are that, also. We think on the contrary that it accommodates itself to any kind of cinematic style. As long as it does not make up the better part of the "mise-en-scene", such, for example, as the silent masters, as Renoir or as the Americans of today conceive it. And Carné, in this instance, has possibly a style of framing and of imagery rather than of direction of "performance", this word being taken in its greatest sense. A quip of Prévert's is not without confirming this opinion for us, "The auteur of a film? It is the performer." The text of is dialogue takes on much more weight when spoken by prominent interpreters: he is one of those who have understood best that it is necessary to write for them while thinking of them. Gabin is never better as Gabin than in Le Quai des brumes or Le Jour se lève. While Renoir, whether one likes it or not, makes him depart from his myth.

Prévert had enough substance to need only which were not always easy to find. When he has them in hand (actors or directors) there remains the inconvenience of assimilating the shooting of the film to a simple performance comparable to that of a musical score. This becomes, we think today, a sorry idea of cinema. Not having had the opportunity to put his hands in the clay, he overloads his script with ideas which a "complete" filmmaker would prefer to express by mise-en-scene alone. Man of letters, by necessity and by metier, one of the rare scenarists who had the right to speak his word. He spoke it, but in his language - in words. These words. in order to claim all of their spice need to surge from behind the screen. but they weigh so heavily on the contours of the film that the people behind the camera use them as an excuse for the greatest laziness. "Alone among metteurs-en-scene of some importance, Clair and Cocteau, and four relative new-comers, Becker, Bresson, Clément and Tati. have escaped this imperious influence." Of course, for they, themselves, have something to say. All this, perhaps, returns to Prévert's credit, as to his reproach. That celebrated Prevertian "tone", we never cease detecting it in Aurenche, Bost, Spaak, Sigurd and a lot of others, and this spuriousness makes finally something foul out of the original. Prévert who is making a comeback with Jean Delannoy's Notre-Dame de Paris [The Hunchback of Notre Dame] is still not at the point when the patina of time dulls the ridicule for the outmoded things of yesterday or of the day before yesterday. The celebrated Dejeuner du matin (you must excuse me for trespassing onto literary terrain) leaves us for the moment as cold as the ornamented slip worn by Michèle Morgan in Le Quai des brumes. The novel and the American cinema have taught us another style of cinematic dialogue, more concise and closer to the natural than his. And also surrealism which he extends and adapts to the taste of a great number is burning out in its final flames, if it has not already been reduced to ashes. Thus, Jean Quéval's book arrives at a critical moment, I mean the most problematic for an appeal, most of all in eyes of our generation who smile of Prévert all the more in order to crush his forgers. Its reading has at the least had the happy after-effect of sending me back to an article by Roger Leenhardt published long ago (May 1945) in the review Fontaine "The Esthetics of Jacques Prévert".This study whose pertinence time has not altered, exhausts in a few pages the crux of the question. It is certain, as Leenhardt says, that film dialogue must be close to spoken language but at the same time possess the "luster" of written language. Prévert combines both these conditions thoroughly since 'the luster of his film dialogue is made up of a thousand "pearls" of human nattering. The words of the author are of the common places. Yes, on this point, Prévert's contribution is incontestable, although he can still be reproached for being a little to set in his system, a literary system which he also practices in his poems. Another point, his penchant for "typing" his characters. From whence, it arises that stylization in Prévert's work seems like a dangerous paradox, if not a shortcoming. It is that is expressed by film, and his success on the screen should not mask from us how much his aesthetic is in opposition to the normal aesthetic of film, Art of persistence, we have said, Persistence permits expressing the progressive modification of a character, its volume, so different from the flat tints of Prévert's characters, fixed, once and for all, like poetic symbols. . . . Poet more than psychologist, creator of atmosphere and characters rather than inventor of subjects, he was completely in his area of expertise in adaptation. The framework was for him only a utility: It was exactly useful for him. Freed of commanded subjects, he seems vexed by the liberty. His characters no longer strut about under solid wire but twist as they please while often losing their consistency and their equilibrium. As proof, the intolerable psychological and social implausibility of 'Lumière d'été'. Filmed the following year, Les Portes de la nuit, confirmed in an enlightening fashion this opinion.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Luc Moullet 10 best films 1957-1968

Film critic and director Luc Moullet was first published by Cahiers du Cinema in April 1956 when he was still only 18 years old. The on-line archives at the magazines
site (which still does not include some special issues from the early years) lists 194 contributions by through 2006. These are his 10 best films lists from 1957 through 1968.

1957
1.....Bigger Than Life (Nicholas Ray)
2.....Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (Fritz Lang)
3.....The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz (Luis Bunuel)
4.....The Wrong Man (Alfred Hitchcock)
5.....Bitter Victory (Nicholas Ray)
6.....An Affair to Remember (Leo McCarey)
7.....A King in New York (Charles Chaplin)
8.....Hot Blood (Nicholas Ray)
9.....Written on the Wind (Douglas Sirk)
10...The Crucified Lovers (Kenji Mizoguchi)

1958
1.....Touch of Evil (Orson Welles)
2.....Dreams (Ingmar Bergman)
3.....Jet Pilot (Josef von Sternberg)
4.....Bonjour Tristesse (Otto Preminger)
5.....Une Vie (Alexander Astruc)
6.....The Quiet American (Joseph L Mankiewicz)
7.....Man of the West (Anthony Mann)
8.....Les Girls (George Cukor)
9.....Paris Holiday (Gerd Oswald)
10...The Seventh Seal (Ingmar Bergman)

1959
1.....Tales of Ugetsu (Kenji Mizoguchi)
2.....Run of the Arrow (Samuel Fuller)
3.....Rio Bravo (Howard Hawks)
4.....The 400 Blows (François Truffaut)
5.....Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock)
6.....Anatomy of a Murder (Otto Preminger)
7.....Hiroshima, Mon Amour (Alain Resnais)
8.....Dejeuner sur la Herbe (Jean Renoir)
9.....Wild Strawberries (Ingmar Berman)
10...Rally 'Round the Flag, Boys (Leo McCarey)

1960
1.....Breathless (Jean-Luc Godard)
2.....Les Bonnes Femmes (Claude Chabrol)
......Moonfleet (Fritz Lang)
4.....Verboten! (Samuel Fuller)
......Nazarin (Luis Bunuel)
6.....Shoot the Piano Player (François Truffaut)
......Les Régates de San Francisco (Claude Autant-Lara)
8.....Plein Soleil (René Clément)
......Les Frangines (Jean Gourguet)
10...Crésus (Jean Giono)

1961
1.....Lola (Jacques Demy)
2.....Elmer Gantry (Richard Brooks)
3.....The Young One (Luis Bunuel)
4.....Pickup on South Street (Samuel Fuller)
5.....A Woman Is a Woman (Jean-Luc Godard)
......Un Taxi pour Tobruk (Denys de La Patellière)
7.....Taira Clan Saga (Kenji Mizoguchi)
......La Tricheuse (E G de Meyst)
9.....Where is Freedom? (Roberto Rossellini)
......Dans la gueule du loup (Jean-Charles Dudrumet)

1962
1.....Adorable menteuse (Michel Deville)
2.....Girl With a Suitcase (Valerio Zurlini)
3.....Les Honneurs de la guerre (Jean Dewever)
4.....Hercules and the Conquest of Atlantis (Vittorio Cottafavi)
5.....Vivre Sa Vie (Jean-Luc Godard)
6.....Wild River (Elia Kazan)
7.....The Flaming Years (Alexander Dovzhenko/Yuliya Solntseva)
8.....Le Signe du Lion (Eric Rohmer)
9.....Cleo from 5 to 7 (Agnes Varda)
10...L'Éducation sentimentale (Alexander Astruc)

1963
1.....The Exterminating Angel (Luis Bunuel)
2.....Contempt (Jean-Luc Godard)
3.....Les Carabiniers (Jean-Luc Godard)
4.....Adieu Philippine (Jacques Rozier)
5.....Bandits of Orgosolo (Vittorio De Seta)
6.....Le Petit soldat (Jean-Luc Godard)
7.....Family Diary (Valerio Zurlini)
8.....The Birds (Alfred Hitchcock)
9.....Irma la Douce (Billy Wilder)
10...Muriel (Alain Resnais)

1964
Canada..........Pour la suite du monde (Michel Brault/Marcel Carrièr)
Denmark........Gertrud (Carl Theodor Dreyer)
France..........La Punition (Jean Rouch)
Great Britain...A Hard Day's Night (Richard Lester)
Italy.............I Fidanzati (Ermanno Olmi)
Japan...........The Hidden Fortress (Akira Kurosawa)
Poland..........The Passneger (Andrejz Munk)
Sweden........All These Women (Ingmar Bergman)
Switzerland...Band à part (Jean-Luc Godard)
USA.............Man's Favorite Sport? (Howard Hawks)

1965
1.....Shock Corridor (Samuel Fuller)
2.....Pierrot le Fou ( Jean-Luc Godard)
3.....The Brig (Jonas Mekas)
4.....L'Amour a la Chaine (Claude de Givray)
5.....The Ipcress File (Sidney J Furie)
6.....Mondo Cane 2 (Gualtieri Jacopetti/Franco Prosperi)
7.....Alphaville (Jean-Luc Godard)
8.....Black Peter (Milos Forman)
9.....L'Enfer dans la peau (José Bénazéraf)
10....Lord Jim (Richard Brooks)

1966
1.....Walkover(Jerzy Skolimowski)
2.....Don Quintin the Bitter (Luis Marquina) see note below
3.....Au hasard, Balthazar (Robert Bresson)
4.....The Man Who Had His Hair Cut Short (Andre Delvaux)
5.....Les Sans espoir (Miklós Jancsó)
6.....Seven Women (John Ford)
7.....The Rise of Louis XIV (Roberto Rossellini)
8.....Age of Illusions (István Szabó)
......Brigitte et Brigette (Luc Moullet)
......Fist in His Pocket (Mario Bellocchio)

1967
1.....Le Départ (Jerzy Skolimowski)
2.....Week End (Jean-Luc Godard)
3.....Stranded (Julien Compton)
4.....Two or Three Things I Know About Her (Jean-Luc Godard)
5.....Persona (Ingmar Bergman)
6.....Blow Up (Michelangelo Antonioni)
7.....Two for the Road (Stanley Donen)
8.....Man Is Not a Bird (Dusan Makavejev)
9.....Playtime (Jacques Tati)
10...What Did You Do in the War, Daddy? (Blake Edwards)

1968
1.....Les Idoles (Marc'o)
2.....Commanche Station(Budd Boetticher)
3.....The Times That Are (Pierre Perrault)
4.....Pop' Game (Francis Leroi)
5.....Bonnie and Clyde (Arthur Penn)
6.....Les Encerclés(Christian Gion)
7.....The Bride Wore Black (François Truffaut))
8.....Love for an Idiot (Yasuzo Masamura)
9.....Diabolik (Mario Bava)

American Films of the Sound Era (Dec63/Jan64 issue)
1.....The River (Jean Renoir)
2.....Rebel without a Cause (Nicholas Ray)
3.....Scarface (Howard Hawks)
4.....Rear Window (Alfred Hitchcock)
5.....You Only Live Once (Fritz Lang)
6.....Rio Bravo (Howard Hawks)
7.....Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock)
8.....The Fountainhead (King Vidor)
9.....While the City Sleeps (Fritz Lang)
10...The Diary of a Chambermaid (Jean Renoir)

French Films since the Liberation (Jan 65)
1.....Contempt (Jean-Luc Godard)
2.....Les Dames du Bois de Boulogne (Robert Bresson)
3.....Pickpocket (Robert Bresson)
4.....Breathless (Jean-Luc Godard)
5.....Les Honneurs de la guerre (Jean Dewever)
6.....Adorable Menteuse (Michel Deville)
7.....Lola (Jacques Demy)
8.....La Ligne de mire(Jean-Daniel Pollet)
9.....Les Carabiniers (Jean-Luc Godard)
10...Les Bonnes Femmes (Claude Chabrol)



A reader posted this comment on one of my other blogs
Sorry to intrude here on this already old post, but I don't see on "My Gleamings" any way to comment nor your e-mail. It is only that I don't think Luc Moullet voted in 1968 Luis Marquina's "Don Quintín el amargao" (supervised and produced by Buñuel in 1935), but rather (in fact, I'm quite sure, since several of Buñuel's Mexican films were re-released or belatedly released) Buñuel's Mexican remake of that same old Spanish play, "La Hija del Engaño" (aka "Don Quintín el amargado", which was used for the French translation of the title), made in 1951 and much better than the 1935 version.
Best,
Miguel María

Labels: , ,

Sunday, July 13, 2008

This short excerpt is translated from Jean Aurenche's memoirs La Suite à l'écran. (pages 157-158, my translation)
When they accuse us of having adapted too often, it should be understood that we were acquiescing to the desires of the directors. It should also be placed in context of the epoque. Few producers would consent to financing an original screenplay. It takes a great deal of time to write an original screenplay. It's rather like a novel. And it's risky. We wrote a certain number which waited years before being produced.
Tu ne tueras point, for example. Others were rejected. Thus, Tavernier found among [Pierre] Bost's papers (me, I kept nothing) a treatment which we had written in 1950 for Paul Graetz, who wanted to offer if to [David] Selznick. At this time. I still read my manuscripts out loud for I had no confidence in the producers. After a dinner washed down with Burgundy, I began to read, but, at the end of two minutes, I became aware that Selznick was snoring. He slept, totally knocked out in his easy chair. Graetz said to me "If you stop, he will become annoyed", so I read a few pages. He was still snoring. It was an incredible scene. I had had enough, he was making so much noise that I stopped. After twenty minutes, he woke up. I then asked him to walk around while I was reading the text. He looked at me as though I were mad and as a result it was never read to him. No more than Graetz. Tavernier discovered the text and had me rework it. It became The Judge and the Assassin.

Labels: , ,

Friday, July 11, 2008

from Arts April 29 - May 5 1959 as reprinted in The 400 Blows; a film by François Truffaut from a filmscript by François Truffaut and Michel Moussy. Edited by David Denby; Publisher Grove Hall (1969) page 225 (Helen R Lane is credited with the translation.)

Truffaut: I see only one common point among young filmmakers; all of them quite systematically play the pinball machine, unlike the old directors who prefer cards and whisky. This is not a paradox, because aside from this game, what I notice mostly is that there are essential differences between us. We know each other, of course, we like the same movies, we exchange ideas in a friendly way, but when the results of our work are judged on the screen, it is noticeable that Chabrol's films have nothing to do with Louis Malle's, which have nothing to do with mine.


Labels:

Saturday, June 07, 2008

I hope to be able to resume writing this blog next month.

Friday, May 09, 2008

Cahiers du Cinema and Paddy Chayefsky

Sidney Aaron "Paddy" Chayefsky was one of the premier scenarist of the "Golden Age of Television" in the early 1950s. When the screen version of his 1953 teleplay, Marty, won the Academy award for Best Picture in 1955, he began a transition to film and Broadway. The following gives some idea of the reception which Chayefsky was accorded at Cahiers du Cinema from 1955 to 1959.

Marty

From Cahiers du Cinema “Cannes Ephemera” June 1955 (page 11, my translation)

That night the USA presented Delbert Mann’s Marty, making a significant impression on the spectators and the jury. It is a sort of “Brief Encounter” American-style. Two solitary souls – the shy young butcher and the not so attractive young woman – meet and open their hearts up to each other. Solitude cedes place to the attempt for happiness. The whole here arise out of the optics and themes of TV and for good reason since it is a teleplay which is the basis of this genial and endearing film.

From Jacques Donoil-Valcroze’s review of Marty in the August-September 1955 issue of Cahiers du Cinema (pages 40-41 my translation)

But the film, which takes place over two or three days, goes along its own happy little road without affectation and reaches its conclusion with no accommodations or concessions. The tone of the dialogue is, in this genre, a model. Chayefsky has effortlessly found the right note which he maintains throughout the film whose simplicity, humor and goodwill are fully appropriate for the proposition.

Marty was considered by Cahiers’ charter conseil des dix in November 1955. It was awarded 3 stars by Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul and 2 stars by André Bazin, Henri Agel and Pierre Braunberger. One star was awarded by Jacques Donoil-Valcroze. The film was bulleted by François Truffaut and Jacques Rivette. The other two panelists – Simon Dubreuilh and Alain Resnais – both abstained.

The Catered Affair

Chayefsky did not write the scenario for the film version of his teleplay The Catered Affair; Gore Vidal took on that responsibility. Scouring the monthly "films released in Paris between" feature of Cahiers and checking Cine-ressources. I can find no release date in France for this film in France. However, the film does have a French title Le Repas de noce which suggests that at some point it was released in France.

The Bachelor Party

From Cahiers du Cinema June 1957 by François Truffaut (page 31, my translation)

This technically impoverished and unequally acted film with excellent dialogue benefits from the admirable photography of Joseph LaShelle and most of all by the influence exercised by the films of Fellini over Hollywood, more personal subjects, more frankness and veracity.

From Cahiers du Cinema September 1957 by Louis Marcorelles (page 30, my translation)

First writer of American television, Paddy Chayefsky, author of The Bachelor Party, is an excellent observer, skillful at typifying his characters, catching hold of them in their most immediate reactions. He composes his narrative a little like a novelist, through an accumulation of insignificant details. More than in Marty, he knows how to depict the banality of existence in a big city in the 20th century.

Delbert Mann, the director, is content to follow the dialogue, to carefully avoid any divergence between image and spoken action. We accept, or refuse, this logorrhea; we like, or dislike, Chayefsky's characters. Their truth, maybe, does not pass beyond the strict circle of the New York neighborhood where we witness them trailing through their worries. But they have the merit of existing, a merit rather rare on the screen, where accomplice shadow favors all escapism.

From Cahiers du Cinema October 1957 by Claude de Givray (page 30, my translation page 56) [note: de Givray's review concerned dually Delbert Mann's The Bachelor Party and Daniel Mann's Teahouse of the August Moon]

Placing itself under the aegis of the first of the capital sins, sloth, we discover The Bachelor Party. Delbert [Mann's] camera is quite as heavy and awkward as that of Daniel [Mann], both still being held on a leash by the memory of the cables of the television studio. But here the damage is limited since the true auteur of the film is the clever screenwriter, Paddy Chayefsky, renowned for his demagogic Marty.

In the conseil des dix, the film was awarded 3 stars by Jean-Pierre Vivet. It received 2 stars from André Bazin and also Henri Agel, Pierre Braunberger, Georges Sadoul and Robert Benayoun. Both Jacques Donoil-Valcroze and Jean-Luc Godard gave the film 1 star. Jacques Rivette and Charles Bitsch abstained.

The Goddess

From Cahiers du Cinema October 1958 by André Bazin (page 50, my translation) [note: André Bazin's review of The Goddess together with a review by him of the film Ten North Frederick were the last reviews by André Bazin published in Cahiers.]

I recognize that Paddy Chayefsky's film has the makings to baffle and I do not take it for a convincing undertaking, but what there is that bothers me in him seems worthy of esteem, if not admiration, and, in any case, interest.

It is worthy to note that Bazin's review mentions Chayefsky from the first paragraph and uses his name 11 times. John Cromwell, the director of the film, is not cited until about three-quarters of the way into the review. His name is mentioned 3 times.

The film was rewarded with 21 stars by the conseil des dix. Bazin, Jean Domarchi, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette and also Pierre Braunberger awarded it 3 stars. Henri Agel and Jean de Baroncelli gave it 2 stars. Charles Bitsch and Jacques Donoil-Valcroze gave it 1 star while Eric Rohmer abstained.

François Truffaut, Louis Marcorelles and Pierre Braunberger placed The Goddess on their 10 best list for 1958.


L'Ecrivain de television

In December 1958, Cahiers published L'Ecrivain de television (The Television Writer) by Paddy Chayefsky, an article that was pieced together from parts of the foreward he wrote for his book Television Plays published in 1955 by Simon and Schuster and also the commentaries he provided in that book for his teleplays The Big Deal and Marty.


Middle of the Night

From Cahiers du Cinema June 1959 by Jacques Donoil-Valcroze (page 46, my translation). Donoil-Valcroze was covering the 1959 Cannes Festival where this film competed.

Nothing that Paddy Chayefsky does leaves me indifferent, but why the devil doesn't he direct his own stories? On this occasion, it is manifest that Delbert Mann is not at the level of the material. Be that as it may, The subtlety and authenticity of the plot, as well as, the veracity in the description of the sociological background deserve better direction than the rather flat and direction of Delbert Mann.

From Cahiers du Cinema July 1959 by Louis Marcorelles (page 56, my translation)

Firstly, the sharp gift of observation of the auteur, his fashion of seizing mediocre human beings in the worst discomfort of daily life. Our Chayefsky takes delight in exposing Yankee materialist nothingness, does not worry for a second of examining the other side of the coin, to understand how these failures of the industrial 20th century nevertheless continue to survive...

Delbert Mann...a veritable piece of blotting paper of a director (that I guess is why Chayefsky dedicates himself with this delirious admiration to him)...

We recall, incidentally, The Goddess, because John Cromwell, its director, is the antithesis of Delbert Mann and Chayefsky. An out-and-out idealism there swept away Chayefsky's miasma provoking the ire of the scenarist worried about this warping.


In the conseil des dix, the film was awarded 3 stars by Jacques Rivette and Jean-Luc Godard. It was awarded 2 stars by Eric Rohmer and Jean de Baroncelli. And, it was awarded 1 star by Jean Douchet and Jacques Donoil-Valcroze, as well as Henri Agel, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul. No one bulleted the film, but Pierre Braunberger abstained.

Labels: ,

Saturday, April 19, 2008

English Films French Critics Part V 1960

This post which continues from English Films French Critics 1959 is the last installment English Films French Critics series.

January 1960
Horrors of the Black Museum, I was Monty's Double, and King's Rhpasody were listed by Cahiers du Cinema as English films which had been released in Paris in the previous month. None was considered by the conseil des dix.

February 1960
The Hound of the Baskervilles, Killers of Kilimanjaro, The Moonraker, The Mummy and Upstairs and Downstairs were listed as having been released in Paris by Cahiers. The conseil des dix did not consider any of them.

March 1960
Long Distance, The Mouse that Roared and Sapphire were listed by Cahiers as having been released in Paris in the previous month.
The Mouse that Roared received 3 star - 1 from Cahiers regular Luc Moullet and 1 each from Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul. It was bulleted by Eric Rohmer and Jean Domarchi as well as Pierre Braunberger. Jacques Rivette and also Henri Agel, Pierre Marcabru and Claude Mauriac all abstained.
Sapphire received 7 stars - 2 each from Henri Agel and Georges Sadoul and 1 apeice from Pierre Marcabru, Jean de Baroncelli and Claude Mauriac. Luc Moullet was the only bullet. Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, Jean Domarchi and also Pierre Braunberger all abstained.
Additionally, the Anglo-American production of George Bernard Shaw's The Devil's Disciple was listed with the American films. This film received 3 stars from the conseil - 1 each from Jacques Rivette, Jean Domarchi and also Jean de Baroncelli. It was bulleted by Henri Agel and Pierre Braunberger while Eric Rohmer, Luc Moullet plus Georges Sadoul, Pierre Marcabru, and Claude Mauriac.

April 1960
Carol Reed's Our Man in Havana was the only film listed as English in the films released in Paris section of Cahiers. It received 2 stars from the conseil - 1 each from Jacques Rivette and Luc Moullet. It was bulleted by Jean Douchet and also Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Marcabru and Claude Mauriac. Both Eric Rohmer and Georges Sadoul abstained.
The Anglo-American production The Wreck of the Mary Deare was cited with the American films. It also received 2 stars from the conseil - this time Jacques Rivette and Jean Douchet. It was bulleted by Pierre Marcabru. Cahiers regulars Eric Rohmer and Luc Moullet plus Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul all abstained.

May 1960
Ferry to Hong Kong, I'm All Right Jack, The Safecracker and Together were the English films listed as having been released in Paris in this issue of Cahiers.
Ferry to Hong Kong was bulleted by Cahiers co-editor Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and "young turks" Jean Douchet and Luc Moullet as well as Jean-Pierre Melville, Jean de Baroncelli and Pierre Marcabru. Three other "young turks" - Jacques Rivette, Louis Marcorelles and Fereydoun Hoveyda - plus critic Claude Mauriac all abstained.
Louis Marcorelles had reviewed the film Together which was directed by an Italian woman, Lorenza Mazzetti, in June 1956 as part of the coverage of the Cannes Film festival coverage. He wrote a second review four years later in this issue of Cahiers and gave the film 3 stars as did Arts critic Pierre Marcabru. Fereydoun Hoveyda bulleted the film. Jacques Rivette, Jean Douchet, Luc Moullet, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze as well as Jean de Baroncelli, Jean-Pierre Melville and Claude Mauriac all abstained.
Louis Marcorelles placed Together on his "10 best films" list for 1960.

June 1960
Cahiers du Cinema recorded The Battle of the Sexes, Northwest Frontier, Blood of the Vampire, Subway in the Sky and Too Many Crooks as English films released in Paris in this issue. None was considered by the conseil.

July 1960
Sink the Bismark, Beyond This Place, Carry on Nurse, The Seventh Sin, Sons and Lovers and Time without Pity were the films from England listed as having been released in Paris.
American director Joseph Losey's Time without Pity received 21 stars from the conseil. "Young turk" Jean Douchet gave the film 4 stars while "young turk" Luc Moullet gave it 3 stars as did Pierre Marcabru and Georges Sadoul. Two stars each came from Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer Louis Marcorelles as well as Jean de Baroncelli. Finally, Claude Mauriac and Pierre Braunberger gave the film 1 star each. No on bulleted the film and no one abstained.
Jean Douchet, Jean Domarchi and Fereydoun Hoveyda from among the "young turks" plus Henir Agel and Pierre marcabru placed Time without Pity on their "10 best films" lists for 1960.
Sons and Lovers received a total of 8 stars - 2 from Louis Marcorelles, and 1 each from Jacques Rivette, Jean Douchet and also Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Marcabru, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul. The lone bullet came from Pierre Braunberger while Eric Rohmer and Luc Moullet both abstained.

August 1960
Lucky Jim was the only English film listed as released in Paris. It was not considered by the conseil.
However, Cahiers had mistakenly classified Fiend without a Face as an American film. Fiend without a Face was considered by the conseil. It received 1 star each from Fereydoun Hoveyda and Louis Marcorelles while Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. Eric Rohmer and Luc Moullet as well as Henri Agel, Pierre Braunberger, Pierre Marcabru, Claude Mauriac, Georges Sadoul all abstained.

September 1960
Three English films - Davy, Hell is a City and SOS Pacific were listed as having been released in Paris. Only SOS Pacific was considered by the conseil. Charles Bitsch, Claude de Givray, Jean-Luc Godard, Luc Mouller Michel Mourlet and Jacques Rivette - all young Cahiers critics - bulleted the film. Jean Domarchi, Fereydoun Hoveyda plus Henri Agel and Jean-Pierre Melville abstained.

October 1960
A Terrible Beauty, Jack the Ripper, The League of Gentlemen, The Scapegoat and Too Hot to Handle were all listed as English films released in Paris.
A Terrible Beauty received 2 stars from Jacques Rivette and 1 star from Jean Douchet. The other eight panelists - Eric Rohmer, Fereydoun Hoveyda plus Henri Agel, Michel Aubriant, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Marcabru, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul all abstained.
The League of Gentlemen received 3 stars from Claude Mauriac and 1 each from Jean Douchet, Fereydoun Hoveyda plus Jean de Baroncelli and Pierre Marcabru. Five panelists abstained - Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer as well as Henri Agel, Michel Aubriant and Georges Sadoul.
Too Hot to Handle was bulleted by Jean Douchet and also Michel Aubraint, Pierre Marcabru and Claude Mauriac. It was passed on by Jacques Rivette, Fereydoun Hoveyda, and Eric Rohmer as well as Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul.

November 1960
Three English films - Malaga, Peeping Tom, and Oscar Wilde - were listed as having been released in Paris and all three were considered by the conseil.
Oscar Wilde received 3 stars from the conseil - 2 from Claude Mauriac and 1 from Jean Douchet. Georges Sadoul bulleted the film. Seven critics abstained - Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, and Fereydoun Hoveyda among the Cahiers contingent and Henri Agel, Michel Aubriant, Pierre Marcabru, and Jean de Baroncelli among other Paris critics.
Peeping Tom received 1 star from Michel Aubriant and it was bulleted by one other critic Pierre Marcabru. As with the preceding film, eight critics abstained - Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, Jean Douchet and Fereydoun Hoveyda among the Cahiers contingent and Henri Agel, Claude Mauriac, Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul among other Paris critics.
Malaga was bulleted by five panelists - Jean Douchet from Cahiers and Henri Agel, Michel Aubriant, Pierre Marcabru, and Claude Mauriac. Five panelists abstained - Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, Fereydoun Hoveyda, from Cahiers and Jean de Baroncelli and Georges Sadoul.

December 1960
Look Back in Anger, The Square Peg and The Stranglers of Bombay were listed as English films released in Paris.
Look Back in Anger received 7 stars. 2 from Cahiers regular Louis Marcorelles as well as 2 from Jean de Baroncelli. And 1 from Cahiers regular André S Labarthe as well as 1 each from Michel Aubriant and Claude Mauriac. The film was bulleted by Jean Douchet and Jacques Rivette while Eric Rohmer as well as Henri Agel and Georges Sadoul abstained.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 14, 2008

English Films, French Critics Part IV 1959

So here is the fourth installment in the series continuing from English Films, French Critics 1958

January 1959
Carve Her Name with Pride, The Flesh is Weak, The Horse's Mouth, Task Force, The Tommy Steele Story, and The Vicious Circle were all recorded in the "Films released in Paris" section of Cahiers du Cinema as English films released in Paris.
Only The Horse's Mouth rated consideration by the conseil des dix. There, it was awarded 1 star each by five critics - two Cahiers "young turks", Jacques Rivette and Charles Bitsch and three non-Cahiers critics, Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli, and Georges Sadoul. Two panelists bulleted the film - older Cahiers critic, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and young Cahiers critic, Jean Domarchi. Eric Rohmer, plus Pierre Braunberger and Claude Mauriac all abstained
.

February 1959
A Passionate Stranger was the only English listed as released in Paris. It did not come up for consideration by the conseil.

March 1959
Horror of Dracula, Passport to Shame,the Anglo-American co-production Me and the Colonel and the Franco-Italian co-production The Widow which was directed by American director Lewis Milestone were listed as English films released in Paris.
Me and the Colonel was considered by the conseil. Seven panelists gave the film 1 star, Jacques Rivette and Luc Moullet from Cahiers plus Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger, Claude Mauriac and Georges Sadoul. Three Cahiers regulars abstained - Jean-Luc Godard, Eric Rohmer and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze.
The Widow received 2 stars from Georges Sadoul and 1 star each from Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger and Claude Mauriac. Luc Moullet and Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. Jean-Luc Godard, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze plus Henri Agel all abstained.

April 1959
Only The Camp on Blood Island was listed and it was not rated by the conseil.

May 1959
This issue saw The Bandit of Zhobe, Blue Murder at St Trinian's and Dangerous Exile listed as being released in Paris. None were considered.

June 1959
Battle of the V-1, Sea of Sand and Three Steps to the Gallows were listed but none was rated by the conseil.

July 1959
Count Five and Die, Harry Black, Ice-Cold in Alex, A Night to Remember, Son of Robin Hood and Room at the Top were listed as "released in Paris."
Only Room at the Top was considered by the conseil. Jean de Baroncelli gave it 2 stars. Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, plus Pierre Braunberger and Georges Sadoul gave it 1 star. The film was bulleted by Jean-Luc Godard and Jacques Rivette and also Henri Agel and Claude Mauriac. It was passed on by Jean Douchet and Eric Rohmer.

August 1959
Law and Disorder
, Windom's Way and A Hill in Korea were all released in Paris. None was considered by the conseil.

September 1959
Operation Amsterdam and Orders to Kill were listed as being released in Paris. The conseil des dix did not consider either.

October 1959
The Gypsy and the Gentlemen, The One that Got Away, Tiger Bay, The Wind Cannot Read were listed as English films released in Paris while the Anglo-American-Irish co-production Shake Hands with the Devil was listed under American films released in Paris
Only Tiger Bay rated consideration from the conseil. One panelist - producer Pierre Braunberger - gave it 3 stars. Those were the only stars it received. Three "young turks" Claude Chabrol, Jacques Rivette and Luc Moullet plus older Cahiers hand Pierre Kast all bulleted the film. Five panelists abstained - 3 younger Cahiers regulars, Charles Bitsch, Jean Domarchi and Jean Douchet plus Henri Agel and Georges Sadoul.

November 1959
Floods of Fear, Yesterday's Enemy and Ralph Thomas's remake of The 39 Steps were released in Paris.
Only the remake of The 39 Steps was considered by the conseil. There, one critic, Georges Sadoul gave the film its total of 1 star. Two younger Cahiers critics - Jean-Luc Godard and Jean Douchet - and an older Cahiers critic - Pierre Kast - bulleted the film. The other six panelists abstained - younger Cahiers critics - Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer and Luc Moullet - and non-Cahiers panelists - Henri Agel, Pierre Braunberger and Claude Mauriac.

December 1959
One film was listed as released in Paris - First Man in Space. It was not considered by the conseil.

The series concludes with English Films, French Critics 1960.

Labels: ,

Friday, April 11, 2008

English films, French critics Part III -- 1958

This continues the series on the reaction of French critics to English films in the 1950s which I began with "English films, French critics Nov '55 - Dec '56" and "English Films, French Critics Part II -- 1957".

January 1958
House of Secrets
and The Curse of Frankenstein were listed in this issue as released in Paris in the previous month. Neither was considered by the conseil.

February 1958
Checkpoint
, Geordie, High Flight, The Naked Truth, Manuela, Wicked as They Come and The Bridge on the River Kwai all were listed as being released in Paris in this issue. None of these was graded by the conseil.
The Bridge on the River Kwai
had been considered by the conseil des dix in the January issue. There, it received 19 stars. Jacques Doniol-Valcroze gave it 4 stars as did Pierre Braunberger. Jean de Baroncelli gave it 3 stars. André Bazin and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze as well as Georges Sadoul gave the film 2 stars. Eric Rohmer and also Henri Agel gave it 1 star. "Young Turk" Claude de Givray bulleted the film while Jacques Rivette abstained. The film was placed on the "ten best films for 1958" of Cahiers regulars Pierre Kast and Jean-Pierre Vivet and also Pierre Braunberger and Roger Leenhardt.

March 1958
The Long Haul
, The Man in the Sky, Breakin' the Circle, Hell-Drivers and the documentary The Bolshoi Ballet were cited as having been released in Paris in the previous month. Hell-Drivers was the only film considered by the conseil. It received 3 stars, Georges Sadoul awarded it 2 stars and Positif's Robert Benayoun gave it 1 star. Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Jacques Rivette bulleted the film. There were 6 abstentions - André Bazin and Eric Rohmer, plus Henri Agel, Jean de Baroncelli, Pierre Braunberger and Claude Mauriac.

April 1958
Only All at Sea is listed as being released in Paris. It was not considered by the conseil.

May 1958
She Played with Fire,
Quartermass 2 and Seven Thunders were listed as being released in Paris in this issue. Only Quartermass 2 was evaluated by the conseil. One panelists - Robert Benayoun - awarded its complete score of 2 stars. Jacques Rivette as well as Henri Agel and Alan Doremieux bulleted the film. Charles Bitsch, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze as well as Jacques Demy, Pierre Braunberger and Georges Sadoul all abstained.

June 1958
None of the three films - Across the Bridge, Doctor at Large and Ill Met by Moonlight - listed as being released in Paris - was rated by the conseil. July 1958 Happy is the Bride and Gideon of Scotland Yard were the only 2 English films entered as being released in Paris.
Of them, only Gideon of Scotland Yard which was directed by the American John Ford, a Cahiers favorite, was considered by the conseil. Jacques Rivette, as well as Robert Benayoun and Pierre Braunberger each gave the film 1 star. Charles Bitsch and Jean-Luc Godard as well as Henri Agel and Georges Sadoul bulleted the film. The editorial triumvirate at Cahiers - André Bazin, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze and Eric Rohmer .- all abstained.
Louis Marcorelles placed Gideon of Scotland Yard on his "10 Best films" list for 1958

August 1958
Carry On, Admiral, The Secret Place and The Yang-Tse Incident were released in Paris. None was considered. September 1958 Eight English films were listed as being released in Paris. Action of a Tiger, Seagulls over Sorrento, Dangerous Youth, Robbery under Arms, The Silent Enemy, The Story of Esther Costello, The Whole Truth and Woman in a Dressing Gown. There was no conseil that month.

October 1958
The Admirable Crichton and The Naked Earth were listed. Again,no conseil.

November 1958
Six English films were listed as being released in Paris. They were- The Abominable Snowman, Campbell's Kingdom, Chase a Crooked Shadow, The Smallest Show on Earth, The Revenge of Frankenstein and The Key.
Director Carol Reed's The Key which was written and produced by American expatriate Carl Foreman and starred William Holden and Sophia Lauren was the only one of the 6 to come before the conseil. It received 5 stars - one each from Jacques Rivette, Jean-Luc Godard, Charles Bitsch, Jean Domarchi, and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze as well as Jean de Baroncelli. The lone bullet was from Eric Rohmer. André Bazin, as well as Henri Agel and Pierre Braunberger abstained.

December 1958
3 films - The Big Money, Dunkirk and Intent to Kill. No conseil.


This series continues with English Films French Critics 1959


Labels: ,